WHO IS AL QU''IDA AND WHAT DO THEY WANT?

The field of spy catching is a crazy one. The world of conservatism is a crazy one. The field of counter intelligence and counter terrorism is a crazy one. At the heart of the engine is catching a politician and political movements and although this sounds easy, it is very difficult to figure out where and when to draw the line. This invisible force acting on the capitalist market and ripping the fabric of peace apart to enrage human beings is difficult to figure out and understand. Where do you stop and when do you stop, is it victory? When you are able to understand the immense proportion and the efforts of security forces around the world, then you can understand how difficult the task is and who is where. There is a natural inclination and a natural rise to this field and also a natural drift to the bottom.

In order to understand the core or the engine of the Cold War, you must understand history and developments. It is tutelage of an unimaginable proportion and begins with the beginning of man and reaches a natural rise and drift in the modern world. The best way to prevent a drift is to anchor something to the drift to either slow it or stop it and this is where counter culture and counter intelligence is relevant. The field of spy catching and catching terrorist has ended many lives and has led to many deaths; do not underestimate it or the opponents. They are out for victory and to seize the power over the global world, to dominate the world for various reasons and selfish interests. You must know or learn when to draw the line and when to fall back because if someone sets out to catch a bad politician, then there is no shortage whatsoever. The question is if there are any good ones. If you cannot catch them, then do not, make them come to you.

The global world and Cold War politics had a major shakedown during the 1950s and 1960s. Without a doubt this is the earliest period of building a coalition force which is the modern day backbone to global security. America is the chosen one. America is the chosen one of the free world and has the contract to promote world peace. The currency is pegged to global trade for this objective and goal. It is a huge contact and a lot of money. War is a nasty business but also a good life if you do not mind the risk, dangers, and outcomes. It is not the safest profession but it is one of the most rewarding and life transforming one. Most people do not choose it unless they must and for those who are the traditional military family and royalty, it is a way of life. It is a warrior class not inclusive but built out and upon the single idea that war is not wanted but necessary for peace.

Philosophy aside, radical left wing and liberal political groups place the entire world under siege during the 1960s and implemented a vast barrage of legal standards which either accelerated or caused a free fall to rock bottom. People do not understand what liberalism is or is not. Moreover, they do not understand what conservatives is not about or preserving. Liberalism is a religion. Liberalism is economic policy and economics. Liberalism is war and peace. Liberalism is as close to communism as anyone will come without actually saying the C word or the S word. Some feel that security and militaries are preventing this world of liberalism from taking shape and denying its power under either capitalism or communism. Again, you must know when to stop with this. Is the world liberal and is the fate of the world liberal or only the politicians who need to win elections?

The 1960s integrated the world of liberalism and radical liberal freedom political groups into the everyday life of everyone. Liberalism is fought over and debated as religious intolerance, racial intolerance, gender discrimination, and factors which make up a genetic characteristic or identification of human subjects. Genetics and characteristics have a large determination on life success or acceptance in life and liberalism is the vehicle which fights these inequities and social injustices. At heart is economics and economic fairness. In the 1960s liberalism became the anchor of economics thus this drift to rock bottom. Liberalism is not as readily identifiable as communism or socialism. This is because it crosses into widespread religions, large ethnic groups, sexism, racism, and a sense of hate for the majority of terrorists and former communists. There are liberals who convince themselves they are conservatives but not the opposite role reversal or the correct path. People sense and respond to hate and politeness. Liberals use this kindness and hate to make it impossible to win at Democracy. There is no way to win unless you fit the mold of a liberal and this is why it borders on insanity. Now security people and the military is going around and fighting every human being on earth and trying to stop “bad people” from becoming powerful or prison guards. This is literally impossible yet also why the liberals and opponents to the Cold War feel they can taunt, chide, penetrate, usurp, and seize the political process. They are so powerful and audacious; they know they are not going to be on the run or ever caught.

Pride and embarrassment has caused liberals to become very active. They have to keep the dream alive and the drift anchored to the favor of liberals. In the 1960s you were considered a trouble maker and in modern times you are considered mainstream and even a hero of the people. How do you keep this dream alive when it turns sour because it is anchored and drifting? If it is drifting, can you define the transformation or process conquest or peace? Is this some diabolical conquest or insurgency or a sudden combustion of freedom? Is it a crime, an act of terrorism, and insubordination to elites as liberals make it or something else? Communism is conquest. Socialism is conquest. Liberalism is conquest. There are two forces on earth who understand conquest and force, Nazism and communism, two of the most powerful ideas who merge and unify into one drift anchored to one idea, liberalism. It is a more powerful drug and the most powerful one out there and it feels like you are fighting the world and righteous, a moral religious conviction to seek freedom, fight the devil, widespread spy catching, and escaping a bad master or severe abuse. Two people in the same moment of time, occupying the same space, but with two completely different and opposite thoughts and goals; that is liberalism and conservatism. Conservatism is also economic policy and military strategy for victory.

If you anchor to conservatives, you are supposed to drift a specific course. If you are anchored to liberals, then you also have a specific trajectory. It is easy to figure out who is doing what and who is knocking on the door. They may keep a lot of secrets to invade your home but we can figure out what they are up to and what they are trying to do. Liberals are trying to integrate and merge into a larger world called the global economic world and global power. The way to this global power is to have a single or dual thought in a single moment in time, while occupying the same space, but with two completely different and opposite objectives and goals. It may be subtle liberalism or massaging nuances which are connected to conservatives. It may be cloning and making the exact same product to package and resell to believers or followers in order to keep up or follow along peacefully. There is hatred and discrimination between liberals and conservatives, along with a war to deny and anchor this drift. Do liberals anchor to conservatives or do conservatives anchor to liberals to create this drift? It comes down to a weak on crime mentality. How far do you take this weak on crime mentality or how far do you investigate a crazy atmosphere where every politician is a spy or have some inclination for liberalism? Unless they have some form of this liberal anchor, they cannot be generous and win elections under these conditions for global peace. Do you let this inanity drift to a weak on crime until it combusts?

Nationalism is not conservatism and patriotism is nowhere the religious conviction which liberals deem irresponsible to save the group. All political groups have a set of beliefs they use to hold the group together and also to keep a culture and religion alive for the next generations. The process of holding the group together is the basis of a martyr, but is it conquest or a perfumed ignorance intended for conquest? Unless someone actually has their hair ruffled, they will not understand this drift, what is causing it, who is behind it, and who is doing what to whom in the name of conquest. Martyrdom is the death of human beings and their rise to a kingdom for their fellow man. Liberalism seek this martyrdom because it is identical to socialism and even communism; a known political suicide.

Is warfare between liberals and conservatives this martyrdom? It depends on the anchor process and the liberation. In the early 1950s, the Republicans recruited the trust of General Dwight D. Eisenhower after 1940s New Deal policies anchored the nation to liberal economics. Is warfare between liberals and conservatives this martyrdom? It depends on the anchor process and the liberation. In the early 1950s, the Republicans recruited the trust of General Dwight D. Eisenhower to run against his superior Harry S. Truman of the Democratic Party. The situation became combustible and what used to be a close relationship soon turned out to be no speaking terms between the Democrats and Republicans. "Ike" did not play the political game like politicians and he had the trust of the world. To Ike being generous would hurt the Cold War, not create tensions and fondle conflicts. Ike was considered a liberator and he relied on his Generals to defeat the goliath of McCarthyism which tried to peg at this undercurrent of separation and problem with unification and conquest. Liberals felt Ike did not stand for peace and waged war against China, North Korea, and Vietnam. He denied aid to the French colonist to hold their empire together. There was so much fear and panic during this period, the world had to anchor to a liberator and a General because that was the only logical choice.

Truman v. Eisenhower was a global plot of liberals to force the hand of the conservatives and make them look or appear as conquests. They could not advance until or unless they were properly integrated in conservatism and elite circles where influence peddling was how to build the machinery. Unless or until the machinery is built, the conservative defection cannot begin or forced to capitulate. It sounds crazy and it is even crazier in practice but this is how you fight the world. Exactly how powerful are the liberals and how much force can they put forth to create a defection? If liberalism is a stronger drug in this world, why would Cold Warriors adopt it knowing it was a hatched plot in the 1960s which took a dive in the 1990s under the next Ike like administration of Ronald Reagan? Everybody knew this was a hatched plot to infiltrate and anchor the global economies of the world to conquest and it riddled spy catchers with soreness. In the 1950s and in response to the New Deal, Dwight D. Eisenhower said, "...And it won't take years of Congressional investigation and a lot of tax money to clean out the whole mess" to address this fuming and overflowing meltdown of liberalism which were the stranglehold of his predecessors. There was so much tension created by liberals it was combustible and a failure. If holding the union together was liberalism then conservatism was on the right path not anchored at all. Truman v. Eisenhower led to US Army crack troops being used and a state of martial law.

The Al Qu’’Ida files are massive and any terrorist expert will have difficulty understand the ravishing and outbreak of terrorism. Global terrorism is currently an accessory of life and a way of expressing convictions, necessity, family values, and a host of other very dangerous and worsening of matters. It is not random violence but preachers, bibles, martyrs, thugs, and guns. The Al Qu’’Ida files have pushed the world over the top of anger and vengeance, a severe combustion. Terrorism is somehow linked to this liberation and this combustion which is closely linked to liberalism. Perhaps it is also an anchor to conquest or martyrdom. Whatever it was, the liberals “took over” where Reagan left off and it took off like a rocket ship; then it starting heading for the ground twice the speed. They are trying to show off and show “US” what they can do and provide as a blanket protection for everyone. Reagan had a second wave and the liberals wanted it and to destroy it. They also wanted to expand their circle of friends to the global level for a blockade and boycott. Globalization was a power they did not know how to cope with peacefully. There was a fight backstage between those who wanted more time or between those about to get on stage and this dragged out for years while the demand for the material was ignored. Meanwhile the middle state of minds were preparing for a stand off and unannounced conquest which nobody would say no to; it was now us and them but nobody knew it.

It is imperative to understand how everybody had been deeply engaged and being attacked by liberals. Conservatives were moving to avoid liberals while letting their ship sink. Liberals felt there was a global conspiracy to undermine socialism and communism. They wanted and needed to strike and exposure to the liberal machine caused everyone to be disgruntled. Therefore, Al Qu’’Ida were initially looked upon as heroes of the people. They were the answer striking out at symbolic authoritarian regimes that went against the liberal machinery and had human rights abuses against liberals. They targeted what produced the taxes, what encouraged the military to fight for, and economic sanctity. They were trying to achieve combustion by the conservatives and a reaction. What it did was created this atmosphere which everybody “deserved it” because everybody was upset with the liberals and blaming them. Terrorism is a reactionary creature to conservatism and leaders who appear in line with the liberal revolution. If you want to look conservative then you had to shave off the beard and not work against the revolution of the 1960s. You had to say yes or how can you not say yes. A lot of people were happy and knew the suspects had hit “US” hard and with everything they had. Something was definitely going on and they were now saying come and get us if you can which turned out to be a tremendous boost for liberalism itself; a double blow to conservatism and Reagan eagerness.

Terrorism is difficult to understand because nobody can figure out the political connections. Moreover, the people who are fighting it are liberals or political groups who are deeply anchored to liberalism. Terrorism is not conservatism but how close or how much is it this plot hatched in the 1960s by liberals? Terrorism has eviscerated every conservative anchor known and disconnected the anchors which conservatism is free drifting and secured it down to liberals who are police groups and political groups deeply anchored to terrorism. Therefore political connections are very important and require the spy catcher to close their eyes and listen to the voice in the back of their minds which speak to them with a third eye wide open. They feel a mole and spy network had infiltrated their security. They feel they were and are being assassinated and need more security and funds. The Cold War is one thing but how do you sell this? You sell it by sitting back observing it and taking notes, let the opponents do the work of the world. These radical groups refuse to turn over information or details to the authorities because this will “steal” their work. It has taken a lot of work and a lot of money to bring it this far along and stealing it is like destroying the left wing or radical liberal economics. It is an act of assassination and a secret war against people who cannot compete and maneuvering into position for a show down, a quiet riot of lunacy.

· Socialism and suicide are one in the same. It is a symbolic fate which is inevitable and an ultimate combustion and violent unrest. To deny it is to be transformed into subhuman insect like stage, a cockroach like state of existence. Suicide bombers are an underground left wing movement like International terrorism.

· Killing a fascist pig is termed “shaheed” or the glory of martyrs. Shaheed is the process of passing shame onto the accused, an act of God; it is a symbolic definition.

· Al Qu’’Ida issued a fatwa in February of 1998 which led to Kenya and Tanzania and widespread unrest by liberals. Those were the biggest CIA outposts and symbols of the revolution. It was a political hit and an act of revenge for human rights violations during the Reagan administration. They felt they would be pardoned and a pull out imminent. It was also a strike on the British.

· The voice of terrorism has ethics and ethnic bias. Maybe this is a curse for liberals but in the world of liberation theory, it is a barrage of perfumed ignorance and favor goes to the liberals.

· there are stories which are twisted and made to fit arguments and plots to cover up failures in thought and discreet imbeciles of agents in charge or their subordinates and favor goes to the liberals

· People are livid with the police or counter terrorism forces including elite military units who risk identification and surveillance to clone or study when they work so closely with infiltrations by liberals and held hostage to integrate their superiority. Now the police and authority is a double edge sword boarding and bonding on the insanity of liberals or conservatives.

· Internal conspiracy plots are widespread and a condition of worsening or absolute paranoia, that is true terror and fear. All liberals are on the move and plotting for victory. They see it the same way and through the same moment in time while occupying the same space.

· Terrorism invigorates liberalism

· this integration process into the on police and security forces by liberals has created an atmosphere of lies and a prerequisite to embrace unions, agents of change, and a dysfunctional government employment which can't seem to get things right or perfect

· If you are not with the revolution and the people, then you need therapy and medication; who is going around and introducing this as official policy?

· Democracy and terrorism is one in the same unless it is liberals in charge

· Liberal objective espionage and economic policy advancement, a closet denial of the inevitable liberation theory of being the same, hence defection

· Liberals are consumed with a perfumed arrogance to say “go away and leave me alone” while they employ psychotic ignorance to pursue or chase others for “freedom.” Freedom to liberals is a police state and warped reality of total flaws superior.

· All peace movements or terrorist groups have a militant wing that enforces the rules and goals of the group; when they are integrated in the state, and then it is legitimized and militarized. This is liberalism and peace.

· It is very difficult to shut the door or release the anchor when they knock on the door and are behind all the doors. Conservatism motto was “just say no”; liberalism motto was “how can you say no.”

After years of investigation and interviewing group members or analysis by terrorism experts, the data is immense and with solid credentials to piece together all the W’s. The only thing missing is the H and how since this rash of terrorism was an outbreak in the White House from 1988 to present day and aimed directly at the military and conservatives. Most specifically, it was the result, a reactionary liberalism, to the events of the Reagan era and bipartisan liberals. The information is immense and logical fluidity. There was a back up and a second wave to Regains Reagan era which the liberals were after; it was a general feeling of being disgruntled and quiet while a witch hunt was taking place. Nobody could say no because it was intended for them to say yes and only yes; had they known or if they were made aware, they would say no. The liberals were headed south and the nation was anchored to them; therefore, they needed more people and more followers; most of all they needed overwhelming force to say no.

1. How do enemies become heroes in the eyes of the mistaken?
2. Who is fighting the wrong war and on the wrong sides?
3. Not random US targets but “symbols” of nations
4. Is this large struggle and conflict understood whatsoever or is it being researched by liberals, thus capturing and studying conservatives and the military?
5. Bad blood in Africa and racial tensions
6. Bad blood with CIA and human rights issues
7. Terrorism is liberal reaction to human rights and believability by fire
8. Taunt and frustrate policy of superiority
9. The ability to live out this religious fate, the inevitable conflict, this true jihad of liberation
10. Radicalization, realization, and racial revitalization
11. liberalism is a brotherhood as with all other religious convictions fighting the devil or racism
12. Pull out, go home, end war, end human rights abuses, support Democracy
13. Relations with oil countries are very strained and tensions leading to combustion; profits are on the backs of the common people of the world, a need to nucleoside or nuclear tide, nuclear drift goes to the secular Arab states over oil
14. Left wing radicalism in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa supported and trained by left wing radicals in Europe and the Americas.
15. Injustices, oppression, inequities, and military action against orthodoxy, profits, selfish intentions, and pure liberalism theory
16. Bin Laden opposes all systems of rule and follows none himself
17. Foe of the people or for the people liberal radicalism of the 1960s peace movements
18. Kenya is a safe haven
19. Entire east Africa region is political dominated cell of massive unrest and civil war over economics and political aid
20. Symbols of oppression and injustices to the liberal movement and left wing
21. Suspicious and weak on crime responses
22. Arab counter culture like what swept revolutions in the 1960s
23. One enemy theory and cell, a growing morphs of unrest and combustion
24. Self defense, land rights, stay away, our homes, our children, our future
25. Conservative revolution of Ronald Reagan upset natural order
26. Student movement and need for engineers and high technology brain drain to other liberal countries where elitism conditions this revolution; militant Asian nations.
27. Extremism and brotherhood is a way out of economic woes, the higher struggle is the overthrow of the state and militant groups
28. Safe havens and existing cells all over Europe and mostly North America and Africa
29. Legal protections for liberals, immigration, and integration
30. Military and foreign aid stimulus to liberal and radicals
31. USA playing on two sides of the Arab world
32. Arab nuisance, not sure who is behind all the unrest but they have made up their minds for a martyrdom or inevitable fate
33. Religion and thugs, the Godless state in denial
34. Not afraid to say or do what makes others happy or seeking, an anger to express truism and realism; thus, want others to know how or what they feel
35. A way to let others know how fed up they are or how their pride is hurt on both sides of the liberal and conservative military
36. Win or loose by integration and revolution a liberal anchor
37. Patriotism and nationalism above the underground of bloody and deadly global events
38. Ruffling the hair of those comfortable and happy
39. The best soldiers in the world and the poor
40. Espionage opportunity
41. Coalition is a conservative chain of economic giants
42. Widespread anti conservatism moderated by Presidents and global political groups
43. Radical franchise globally known
44. Bragging rights for radical groups (Gladiator coliseums in Chicago, IL)
45. Weak on crime governments
46. “Political ploy” and “significance” – Charles Powell, terrorism expert –
47. “mutating web” and “do not understand” – Jean Louis Bruguiere, terrorism expert –
48. “1980s groups such as Red Army, Abu Nodall, IRA, and others” who “disagree” to “amorphous like” – Xavier Raufer, terrorism expert –
49. Bosnia and European links in the Balkans
50. Islam and free trade or coalition of members from Regional free trade unions (i.e.: European Union)
51. Role of Israel and left wing political groups in this free trade wave sweeping the world and brain drain of engineers and computer experts
52. US origin of radicalism and planning, face off with leadership and global planners
53. The grandest merger ever in the history of mankind
54. Arab world thinks Zionism entire media
55. Arab world thinks Zionism is capitulation to capitalism
56. Everybody loves and supports Israel and killing Arabs for pride
57. CIA blames media and false information fed by liberal supporters even if nobody is listening
58. Sunday Bloody Sunday, a roof over everybody’s head and reefer in their cupboards
59. Concerned how people are judged and by whom; what are these consequences?
60. Assimilation problems.
61. Rogues launched a secret war, massive injection of support, experience, and funds
62. Politicians launched a political war
63. Military caught in the Middle of integration, could not peg dollar for global security any longer; had to implement firing orders and management containment contingency
64. Police forces got massive boost for liberals to hold the line
65. Negotiators put meat hooks in and made torture unbearable; either secret war or political one
66. Militant wings created unrest everywhere, a liberal reactionary response
67. Liberals all over the world are upset how the revolution is going and why; they wanted to strike at the symbols while they rose to power and instilled policy change and political relief. This was a three to four prong attack in various areas of the world.
68. More anesthesia and no more pain; Create pain for opponents while denying any anesthesia or chance; then seek surrender or prison as captive; seek defect or destruction while reinvigorating funds and relief.
69. It is difficult to define this cell or compound and how large the force waiting is. Be generous and it won’t hurt as much. Issuing a warrant for the arrest of these radical leaders has been problematic and very difficult. They control the legal and in certain areas, the judge, jury, and executioners. It is impossible to fire them or even catch them. These are untouchable spies and their intention is defection and more support.
70. Subtle applause
71. Immigration: yes or no? Wreck house and property of others as in the early 1990s while storm was gathering. Renters wrecked up house and property even worse.
72. Moving out and overseas made things worse. Now more attacks and more damages again in early 1900s as the storm were gathering. Liberals were complaining to the boss and making the boss complain to the liberals; thus this back and forth avoidance period with the liberals. They were casing the city and the targets to hit or the leaders by infiltrating the conservatives.
73. Police pressures were immense payments were needed or risk of possible arrest and imprisonment. Police forces also kept the pressure up by declaring mentally ill or insane, were they talking to the boss back in the early 1990s before sudden combustion.
74. These groups were floating around Washington D.C. asking who wanted in since after the Reagan era in 1988. They were linked to Chicago, New York, South Africa, and Britain initially. There was no sign of Middle East activity or any clues of a Middle East plot only an anti right or anti conservative wave of reactionary by the great communicator of events to come.
75. Terrorism is a process of reclamation or retribution for the political events of the 1960 to 2008 and it all came out of Texas and the mid west states. This reclamation was seeking admission and disavowing the events of the 1960s by conservatives while pushing the liberal revolution one step over the top. Once over the top, defection and scornful liberation can occur regarding a host of embarrassments.
76. This period of reclamation had the Reagan Generals on the run and with federal charges and indictments until information was presented which vindicated them. Some were targeted for assassination by the liberals and the militant wing; others were targeted for kidnapping and re-education; and others were put under surveillance to find the headquarters and the gold. The liberals also had the British intelligence on the run and panicked with events in Europe. That information was being guarded closely by the liberals and deadly. The implications were so severe they were willing to kill in cold blood to protect it or shut people up. They want people to say yes and not question them or bipartisanship.
77. Felt the pegging of the greenback was under danger by oil money, inflation, and various threats. When the Europeans began to peg on a single currency, this was a sure sign of panic because the oil states held the decisions along with the global free traders. Panic struck the liberal compound and their economists. The ground began to shake economically and led to rash irresponsible economic failures. Pressure was building up from everywhere while nationalism was the reactionary.
78. Use of the word “terrorist” and “Nazi” is used loosely and scornfully. When high rewards and cash bounties were offered for terrorists, it led to many abuses and definitions. Politicians and group leaders were ignored; only the militant wing was targeted which led experts to become confused by a morphing process of events and a worsening of the problem. Combustion and a quiet riot were coming and the cells were already in place.
79. Iraq could be a pro Israel or anti Israel surge and a witch hunt was underway. The liberals feel they are the voice in the Middle East and the only voice because of anti secular Democratic regimes and religious conviction. Oil was funneling globalization and a primary enabler. If the oil flowed freely then the brotherhood would be in grave danger because of the pegging process and the currency problems.
80. Iraq was a test for the best Generals and not the worst to present a solution and to seek rewards or rank. It will work in the favor of the liberals while taking down the conservatives or reverse Reagan trickle down theory. The best solution was to pay a stipend to militant groups and have them agree to armistice in return for payments.
81. A veteran for peace is a transformation from warriors to peace activist and re-education.
82. Bosnia is the centrifuge of East and West intermixing, liberal and conservative religions; it is a hub of this revolution but no longer under communist control. The people who had created the atmosphere did not leave and the liberalism was in full swing. This is not communism, this is the age of liberalism and the cells are everywhere in the world. The financing machine is everywhere and more difficult to trace due to the liquidity.
83. Something triggered the combustion, perhaps a figurative event which caused severe hurt or some frustration of not being able to progress. A severe despair set in. Maybe the grip and bad policies of the Clinton and Bush years led to severe despair and frustration. This was now very crazy stuff and trying new things, a surge. Perhaps it is a testament between religious conviction, liberalism, and thug politics in the age of technology. People blamed the government and they lived under the rule of liberals who wanted to strike out.
84. Exactly how powerful is the liberal movement compared to the conservative movement in the world? This was some type of measure and a new age.
85. Conservatives would never sit down with the enemy but the danger is the enemy seeking them. The enemy wants peace and revolution and when frustrated, strikes out with combustion and liberalism. Conservatives become hard liners under this pressure, not militant revolutionaries.
86. It is uncertain who is holding the union hostage when economics usually hold the union together and Constitutionalism. At this time debt is holding the union or keeping it from socialism.
87. Liberals, both males and females, believed in themselves and a sense of truth and honor to be free and free of any authority to govern their life which was the birth of liberation theory during the 1960s and Civil Rights laws. Civil Rights laws repelled issues such as sexism, racism, and widespread discrimination or hate. It did not address bias or motives, only legal and literal interpretations. The issue was ripping society in pieces.
88. Canada has always been a safe haven for radicals, liberals, and draft dodging peace activists. The Canadian underground is closely linked to Al Qu’’Ida. It is like a return to the Austin Powers’s movie and psychedelic times but out of touch with the times. The leaders of the counter culture have expanded and they are very mad and very intent on overthrowing the state if they can get everyone to agree to yes or not have a choice in the matter. They are extremely hurt and their pride has nowhere left to go but to drift while anchored.

The origin of radical extremism and religion can be traced back to events in both Africa and the United States of America. In 1964, the Organization of African Unity was formed in conjunction to many Islamic brotherhood groups assimilating in the United States and other places. The African plight was the same plight of many African Americans in the United States. In the United States, the preferred method of the Islamic brotherhood was bombings. Malcolm X himself after being firebombed and eventually killed said, “This is how they fight.” In the movie, “Lethal Weapon” fire and house bombings also indicated an African plot to radical South African terrorists roaming the United States. Therefore, these things are known.

In the case of certain groups such as The Nation of Islam, their grievances were internal and directed at each other. The police had infiltrated the group and they did not trust each other. They did not know if the problem was the police or their own members. This same mindset is fixated on liberal and conservatives in politics. The general result is a deep feeling of being disgruntled and stepped on. Since Vietnam, there has been a rash of secret wars in South America and even Africa. Only until the Persian Gulf War came up on the radar screen did the world see something new and different. On September 11, 1990 President George H.W. Bush issued a fatwa on naked aggression and new surge of “Nazism.” It was a pure form of aggression and brute force which was unstoppable politically or militarily.

Military might and allied coalition forces were tearing this world apart. At the same, it was keeping it together and peaceful. The only time Indonesia has ever surfaced on the radar was during the early 1960s and the period of Sukharto who had bad blood with the CIA because of the socialist and communist leanings. Naturally, the tensions between the East and West were symbolized by the East Timor conflict where human rights became once again some form of genocide on the Jewish Portuguese colony. The same mindset can apply to the Philippines and the years of struggle there. Pre World War II and post World War II in the Philippines were very liberal oriented and it stifled economic progress; then led the nation into bouts with extreme poverty. Tensions between the Philippines and Japan led to bad relationships in the Navy and other military structures.

THE 1960'S AND THE REAGAN REVOLUTION: THE STORM

Most people who have grown up in the United States or know anything about US history associate liberalism and left wing groups with the 1960s. In each and every case, these groups are and were under the surveillance of federal authorities who were typically linked to a larger war of greater consequence than the specified outcomes they were seeking. During that time, there were very little if any plausible pressures to question both their motives and even intent, although it brought a lot of suspicion and affirmations of foreign subversion in the United States who were part of a greater global struggle. If you are a person who is linked to the 1960s, you will begin to feel a process of transformation occurring.

This transformation is as follows. Liberation movements seeking social equality and the overthrow of the government for a larger global struggle were legitimized legally and public awareness and acceptance of them decreased. In the eyes of the public, they had grown up and were no longer a threat but had legitimized their plight as political opponents or took their cause to a more legitimate level. At the same time, the economic conditions made them primary suspects and individuals who had the greatest motives to legitimize legally this transformation and accusation of some widespread conspiracy by the government to destroy the lives of innocent people.

These liberal and left wing groups have always been the center of much criticism and suspicions. Historically, the members of these groups and their traditional politics were of grave suspicion to a greater war and a greater struggle between nations. Some call them opponents of the right wing movement and the military. In each and every case, these left wing and liberal radicals have been tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. During the 1960s, this heightened period of social tension established a period of both change and legitimization of this problem.

This torment and rivalry has not gone away. Over the course of fifty odd years from the 1940s most if not all of the efforts of government security has been directed towards these individuals and elaborate international espionage rings. There was a big insurgency and an attempt to seize the instruments of government and legitimize and forward this larger and greater war. The 1960s were a tragic joke which reaffirmed this inking and crawling movement which was there and in existence. There was a higher and much more professional side of this greater struggle. The history of this struggle is racked with one case after another which points to liberal and left wing groups, politics, beliefs, religion, and economic plight. This was a sophisticated struggle over control of the nation and the world. In other countries, it was tied to government overthrow and regime power changes. This was left wing against the right wing and solid economic policies to power.

After the 1960s, these groups became incorporated into society and legitimized as a legal political opponent. Police actions against them and surveillance took a backseat to immediate threats and violence. Thus, instead of being under surveillance or classified as an enemy of the state, these groups were being targeted and victims of hate crimes or acts of terrorism. The legal proposition has always been in the favor of these groups seeking political rights and legitimacy. Their left wing beliefs and the threat of overthrowing the government for a wider and greater struggle dwarfed the idea they were victims and targets for terrorism. Therefore, part of their complaint was the inability to acquire police action and protections, a denial and confirmation of a legal nuisance and denial of rights.

Beginning in the 1980s, another problem afflicted the development of these radical left wing movements. They disappeared and became incorporated in the larger political system now that their struggle was legitimized and even successfully won in the courts. They had the support of the general public; however, this is a period of downfall and tremendous economic pressure. This political base was eviscerated and annulated like a military bomb was dropped on them. The growing suspicion was a conspiracy by traditional political enemies to destroy them and assonate their political struggle. It was viewed as poison before and now it was viewed as self inflicted poison, a time period of drinking “kook-aid” and political suicide. They felt a quiet conspiracy and a covert effort to eradicate them was taking place and it felt as if this was the case because they had no reality to stand on any longer but had been legitimized. The public accepted these 1960s radicals and assimilated them into the nation. They were no longer on target lists and were not supposed to be victims any longer.

During this period, terrorism kicked up tremendously. These radical left wing and liberal groups were new recruits now and fighting radical religious extremism. The public accepted them now as the police, an anti terrorist squad, and no longer a traditional threat. It seemed as though the process of political protection was expanded to a global and even military level. Now the traditional enemies were on counter insurgency teams. They were leading investigations into attacks on the nation. There were plots to kill or maim them and violence which was typical in the 1960s by hate groups. The traditional espionage enemies who were under surveillance for tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system; were now investigating it. They had their political enemies and opponents under police actions. They were legalized and legitimized and now were conducting interrogations and police investigations.

However, they were struggling in the most difficult and most threatening period of their life. Their “father of the struggle” and ideological basis of their belief system collapsed. They were eviscerated and evicted from the political scene internationally and no longer a global solidarity or solvent nation. If their spy ring or invisible grand elaborate espionage plot which was too powerful globally, then it too was eviscerated, torched, and disembowel. They were no longer tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system and driven to the point of either surrender or war. This was a global blow of a magnitude unimagined because trillions of dollars had been spent to destroy them by governments. If they were chasing and trying to destroy and tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system; then this Cold War finally ended.

This was not the case and not what was going on. The entire left wing was on a witch hunt and trying to interrogate people to find out how the socialist movement was defeated or who if anyone conspired to end communism. The liberal movement was destroyed by conservatives. In this effort to trick and entice people, they wanted or tried to induce as much pain and suffering as possible. It is an effort to intierror-gate Cold Warriors and military personnel to forfeit how the communist bloc was destroyed and the traditional hard line position. That is similar to saying “right wing conspiracy.” Under the cloak of some state security service and bipartisan investigation, they were launching a witch hunt to uncover this conspiracy to embarrass and humiliate the left wing and liberals. Then turn around and punish as harshly as possible anyone who showed up on the radar or until someone provided answers. This liberal movement now was discredited and under tremendous pressure politically and in the public eye; however, they were under so much pressure they were made to appear either real or imagined lunatics and crazy people who sought democratic rights. They were made to look, feel, act, and conditioned to be a joke and pathological liars.

In 1967, roles would be considered a protestor and a peace activist. Today, you would be classified as a liberal left wing hero fighting terrorism and Arab nationalism. In 1967, roles would be considered anti communist or Cold Warriors. Today, you would be classified as a conservative felon and primary suspects or terrorists against the peace movement and socialism. Driven to the point of despair and self destruction, it was now impossible to do this peacefully and overthrow the government peacefully. The plight for nonviolence had to be abandoned because it was getting nowhere and politically was a lunatic cause, an act of political suicide which was the fate of socialist cult groups during the 1960s. These groups were forced into a position of inadequacy and they wanted blood; they wanted to throw everything at and increase the tormenting of right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. It was not surrender but almost a shooting war. The left wing feels they were politically assented and a new killing season to deny a merger of minds to the right wing and a call to surrender by the right wing that they were tormenting. They felt the government was now union busting and the political will was a union bust which is going to hurt a bipartisan effort. They think it is a union bust and liberal bust which is also what brought down the Soviets and communism. Who did it?

The people who were fighting for hippies and liberation or peace, today are fighting for liberal rights. There is some form of liberation theory and some liberal revolution. Conservatives are just not conservative enough for this new revolution. It’s all debt and controlling inflation, a closed shop. There is nothing that makes sense. Conservatives are now counter culture. Liberals are trying to change the nation and have a new religion or new liberal theory. If you look at the most wanted list, the FBI in 1967 was after all leftists. Today, most if not all are right wing while liberals are not considered. This is why most conservatives are siding with the left wing; it does not pay to be conservatives. There was a counter reaction movement internal to government. An internal and illegal Civil War which had been fighting since the early 1900s and much greater than all the armies in the world; there was no army in the world which could or had a chance against this threat.

There is a hostile revolutionary group who is working with elected officials to figure out why they cannot pay the bills and having so many financial problems. They claim it is a conspiracy to get rid of them and make them worse people who are stronger at the ballot box. If they are cold warriors and real interrogators, they would brandish something; not show a soviet style spy network and families who are trying to recruit others for this ring of thieves and socialists. It is not a conspiracy it is bipartisan and secret investigations; left wing undercover work and sleuthing. They know the union bust and the crackdown if they are not careful; especially hitting and facing off the military with everything they have. They feel the military is behind it all and originated with the Reagan administration and kept up the pressure afterwards. Once again, a merger was occurring and two sides were going. What about the militant wing and their efforts to tormenting of right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. It was not surrender but almost a shooting war. They are still victims and wanted to merge again with the traditional enemies of this war. They also wanted another level of political legitimacy but had this conspiracy holding them back. It was a stand off of traditional forces.

They feel the military is behind this and originated with the Reagan administration who kept up the pressure afterwards. It is a left wing secret army bent on figuring out what they can get away with and how strong of a force they will need; it is bipartisan dominated effort to seek revenge and not solidify political beliefs and goals. They do not have the ability to nonviolently protest and want to know how far they can get with this disgruntled revenge merger. The federal agents stared them down so many times and hit them with everything they had. They hit back with the usual politics and legitimizing process of legal standards conducting a victim of terrorism and peaceful protest. The people behind this are the security services and some claim to be cold warriors. The entire left wing is on a witch hunt and trying hard to interrogate people to find out how the socialist movement was defeated or who if anyone conspired to end communism. In this effort to trick and entice people, they want to induce as much pain and suffering as possible. It was a conspiracy at the highest levels and it came to an abrupt end.

It is not that difficult to figure out. Nothing good has ever come from politics and until that changes or this world can dispose of this problem, it will dump its “peace” on others and attack them in the name of “progress.” That is greed and the pure greed of both right and left wings. It is also a total idiot of a loser who is going around, with might and audacity, not asking but yelling at others how they are on the verge of losing their minds. How total losers in this world can get away with yelling at others or being in their lives while telling them they are on the verge of losing their minds is a mystery. It is also pure lunacy.

The political system is consumed by lies and at this time they are on the verge of lunacy and are not thinking clearly. Big large problems sputter by this lack of reality and dealt with by borrowing money and debt. In the end, people will vote for them because they are desperate and dependant; they have no other choice because the capacity of the earth’s population has exceeded its capacity to support itself. The same applies to liberal economic theory and this idea of left wing politics. It makes no sense to keep borrowing and increase debt when the earth’s capacity is well exceeded and well past its capacity to support itself. From here on it will be reverse evolution and constant struggle with lunatics who are on the verge of insanity and lunacy. When they loose all sense of reality, they will attack with force in the name of peace and prosperity. They have to eat and they have to watch out for their interests. Who in their right mind would use sheep to catch monsters, which is not red baiting?

Oil and energy policy has made good bait because politicians love to borrow and spend money they do not have. Instead of doing the right thing, they want to borrow more money for health care and the energy crisis while lowering interest rates to a level with encourages more debt and spending. It is either that or recession. This is a total idiot who is on the verge of insanity and loosing their minds. They are trying hard to avoid questions and telling what diabolic plan or plot they have in their mischievous and evil minds. They were proud to be part of communism before and now they are proud to wreck capitalism or wreck the lives of innocent people. This is a terrorist and someone who wants to vandalize everything not because they love communism or can win, but simply because they are thugs and total losers. This is a terrorist who has convinced themselves they are mighty, strong, and possess or control others. It is clear they are disturbed and secretive and being held back before something bad happens. What they do not tell others will not hurt them or expose them.

As disturbed and deranged as they are, they want others to reconsider holding them back. The people in this world are arming themselves to the teeth because they have the right to live and have a right to be free. However, when you have lunatics and losers who insist they are the same or of equal quality as everyone, then fight tooth and nail everyone who wants to die or fight back, then their effort to be the same needs to come to an end. If this means holding them back, then most people would not know what to do or what to say to this utter loser who is in despair and desperate. Are they for peace and prosperity or are they the closest representation to the devil this world has seen. The world knows and understands the left wing and the liberals are the closest representation to this concept. The question is when and if they attack and overthrow what holds them down. Should everybody reconsider holding them down while they fight everyone who gets in the way of this march to political suicide?

SPY RING AND SOME ESPIONAGE PLOT

It is believed that there is a movement inside Judaism and the Jewish state of Israel which has the primary focus on liberalizing other societies and specifically the United States. It is believed that during the Cold War, the Jewish religion was used as a proxy for the Cold War to set up satellite and cells which made it very difficult to track and follow the movements of foreign saboteurs or spy rings. The objective was to set up a police state or something similar to the NKVD who had absolute access and punitive control over others for the mere suspicion of terrorism or any form of suspicion for authority. This punitive control needed legitimacy and police powers to kidnap, siege, and place under surveillance all subjects who were deemed inappropriate, heretics, and on the trail of a larger problem or struggle. Therefore, by using a proxy, retaliation and legal authority would not be questioned or possible. Either opposition was a terrorist or they were not but if they were, they were interrogated and scared into some form of punishment to comply them.

The use of the Jewish state allowed several advantages. Primarily it was a different set of conditions and laws which security personnel would not question, investigate, or challenge. This was an ally who had little or not suspicion and also deemed heroes against the most brutal forms of violence. On the back of this public image were the immigration patterns to and from the Soviet Union and other global nations where religious persecution caused so much suffering and pain. However, security forces and police could snuff opposition quick and early before they had to answer or provide any evidence if accused of espionage or acts deemed dangerous. The trail would simply end and with no ability to go further. However, this spy ring was given the authority, funds, and public assistance to set up satellite offices, military weapons, and current technology to fight this enemy. It was an opportunity to set up a secret police much similar to the NKVD or the CHEKA in the former Soviet Union. It would be clandestine and with total secrecy with the ability to snuff and eradicate any opposition.

If you trace the time line or the spy ring, it will date back to the 1940s, maybe even before that. Then the satellite offices will flow from the Soviet Union, to Jewish immigrants and the Jewish state, then to the elite families in other nations, then to police authority or counter terrorist forces. It will stop and end with Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration. It will then pick up with the Bush and Clinton families. At this time, all that is known is a huge mammoth goliath engaged in domestic clandestine activity and investigations. It is using kidnapping and creating a war like climate by using intimidation and radical groups to promote a condition of being under siege and asking for relief. Then they will present themselves as a “messiah” or “protector” with a service someone may be interested in. They are trying to talk to the highest military Generals and seeking political entrance to integrate into a larger struggle. What they are doing is employing encroachments and asking if they are included in the club or being kicked out.

The reason why the Jewish religion was chosen as a prey or a target is because of the Middle East situation. Also, they are on the frontline of combating terrorism and a police state. They have satellite cells in almost every western state and some say they are easily manipulated, never questioning authority or seeking the truth. This is where the “liberal” movements can now begin to play their cards and manipulate the Jewish state. You have the peace movement and radical liberal groups who sympathize with the Jewish state. The expansion of the peace and free love movement is very easy or unopposed. They already have entry and already have admission to the most powerful levels of the media, police authority, government, and business interests. Therefore, you can trace this spy ring from the Soviet Union and bloc, diverted to the Jewish state or satellites, the elite families such as the Bush and Clinton families, then to expand or cell rings with official and unofficial authority. You can also employ espionage and extradition to the Jewish state to seek legal submission.

From here the dynamics of the 1960s can be understood and the process of integrating social injustices, inequalities, traditional left wing politics and the mammoth of them all liberalism. Someone has integrated the party of Ronald Reagan with objectivism for liars and radical individualism; thus, they created a climate consumed with lies and an acceptance of radical legalism. Some call this utter failure and flaws with legitimate love for ultimate selfishness. There is a mentality of paranoia and enemies closing in with tricks and constant deception to be the hand of God. This climate of deceit may have been created by the Civil Rights movement and various legal issues during the 1960s which resulted in a massive effort to integrate the left or liberalism.

There are two very big movements under the liberal wing. One large movement is the authority and budget of the anti terrorism forces, the secret police. The other is a publicized and widespread peace movement. All of those forces have their own militant wing. Every liberal organization or liberal political movement abides by peace and nonviolent protest; however, they all have a militant wing which they use when frustrated or given up on peace. The ultimate goal is economics and the overthrow of the state; liberalism is nothing more than economic policy. The overthrow of the state is most easy when it surrounded by economic policy or ideology. This can be public funds, private funds, or private interest groups. Liberalism has no bounds but must create conditions of equal challenge and authority to be the same or considered worthy, credible, legal, elite, popular, superior, and all the fakeness of a club or cult group. Freedom is the vehicle which allows this and legalism is the protection for liberalism. However, how do you strike and retaliate like Cold Warriors or a military machine? When this imploded during the Reagan era, the conspiracy theories began to settle in because the damage was almost irreversible and inevitable.

From 1989 to 2008, a period of reclamations and reconciliations took place. It was a period of shuffle between two elite families, both of whom were considered very powerful and elite Cold Warriors. During this period, there is massive turmoil even if the collapse of the left wing did not happen during this time. Militant groups were active and became active everywhere and nobody understood why or what they were fighting for. Were they using the traditional enemies to manipulate and those who never questioned authority and truth to create opportunities which were now gone or imploding? After Ronald Reagan, the trail of money and clandestine funds stopped or ended abruptly. There was a period of integration and now was this come backflow or re-integration or reverse integration? The militant groups were out in storm wrecking everything and many people were caught in the storm or were witness to the invisible footsteps of this clandestine spy ring which was linked directly to the Soviet Union who was also trying to figure out how to fix it or whether a conspiracy took them out. If so, they knew they were in a lot of danger and in a lot of trouble. Someone stirred up the cuckoos nest and there was no turning back. How do you stay the same or keep up? How do you seek the public funds or integrate further? How do you get the money to pay for the militant wings and the secret police that can maneuver and strike any revolt or opposition? Now it was about liberal economic policy and liberalism itself, the drug which is much stronger than both communism and socialism.

Keep in mind; this is not about liars but instead objectivism to liars or the truth. How can terrorists and spies sit in front of the world make these claims is unbelievable. When they are ready to dismantle this, then the process can begin to determine who did what and how. Things just do not get the way they do, there is a point where someone becomes a liar and cannot return. They were proud to be part of communism, let us see how proud they feel to be part of capitalism and dismantling it. Is it that simple to terrorize people and then say how it is peace and progress working for everyone?

In order to understand what happened, how it happened, why it happened, and the tremendous pressure the liberals and left wing is under; the process for comparison and contrasting Ronald Reagan and the Margaret Thatcher conservatives against the backdrop of traditional liberalism of the left wing and military might, a movement considered the populist movement and liberalism. The leader of that movement is by and large the legendary Theodore Roosevelt and the era of the New Deal. This backdrop is also highlighted by World War II and what it produced, the greatest generation. Inside this “war” will also be a struggle within the military which either curried opposition or support during Korea and Vietnam periods of the Cold War.

Teddy Roosevelt is by far the worst President stinky legs have ever produced; however, he stood for objectivism and liberation for everyone. Roosevelt has been blamed and has not answered for more questions and mysteries than any other President in the history of the United States. Some say he gave them economic life and opportunities while others say he destroyed global economics. Again, a member of the flawed and too weak to admit it club. Dangerous clubs which bring out demons and make others yell at them because they are not good enough but do not want to sit down or go away. These types make the best fighters only because their powers are rage fill psychotic fits. Theodore Roosevelt was a great man by not his own vices but those around him and he must keep this continuous or else he will be exposed for who he is. This is a very big club and they are very hard to detect because of the inability to understand them and admit their flaws.

This club is the best friend to the weakest people and they have deranged individuals who give them gospel truth because of this deception of flaws and lack of truth. If you are trying to knock on the doors of their compound, then it is like knocking on the doors of the Branch Dravidians. They are ready, waiting, and panicked by your aggression and temperament. If you try to seek the truth from them, they will hit you so hard that you will never want to chase or ask for the truth again. Meanwhile, they will send who you hate the most and ask you to be friends with them or accept their protection. That is working together and teaching people how they rely on each other. Therefore, you are dealing with a very powerful club and they may appear peaceful to the senses, but have a dark side like any other human being on earth. There is layer upon layer. Nobody has any idea what this compound looks like because it is layers of government. They may want the truth but not at this time; right now they want to be free and healthy which will end up being one defiant act after another.

This is about power and domination over the world, not some religious university or cult group. What they want to achieve is to keep up and stay in the fight but this can only happen when their fight is allowed. Yes it is another one, and another one, and another one; until the reality is ready to accept reality of the environment instead of the truth or truth telling. You may go after their enemies because they are criminal and obvious, but they have you surrounded and beat with reality and a total lack of truth. What they want is freedom and help. They want to be healthy and normal like everyone else but they cannot do this without absolute power or holding others back. This is about their pride and how proud they are, they are not going to go down without a fight. What you are taking away from them is something a price tag or the destruction of the world cannot even compare to. What they want right now is change but there is really no change that is going to make them free or make them healthy, it ends up as complete defiance and a trap to hold someone down while they tell them to calm down or stop being difficult.

This is a very dangerous group in this sense. They stand by Ronald Reagan while acting behind his back. They love greatness but do not embody it. They want and love freedom but do not know what it is. They have an idealism which is deranged at times and very defensive. This idealism wants to fix problems and fix things but the lack of mental thought and efforts ends up making it worse. Then it is a matter of pride and embarrassment which causes these people to become nasty, angry, and even violent. If you see them as bad people, then they are bad people. If you see them as a cult group who ultimately is seeking benevolence by members, then there is no threat once this is achieved. If you see them as putting in the efforts and being honest about freedom but sabotaging it because they do not understand freedom or what the problem is, then that is the most accurate description. Eventually, the drift and the failure will be so overbearing the flaws are acceptable and it’s just “another one of them” with the same idealism and promise to make a difference. Ronald Reagan was a great man himself and he surrounded himself with people who were greater and listened to them and respected them. He did not play the game Teddy Roosevelt played and made himself appear caring and popular while having populist movements accept his bovine and obvious flaws. He was a real person with very little tricks who surrounded himself with the strongest people, not the fakest or most caring.

This greatness made him just as defiant. People followed him because he had the power and they did not have any choice. He made people feel inadequate and even angry because things are intended to deserve and backed by an honor system. When you tell someone who tries so hard how they have freedom and want to fix problems they are not great or a failure, they become very defensive and undeserving. From here on, things can become very hairy and dangerous because some of these people are so deranged, they feel some fight is necessary and their pride is on the line. They are not willing to accept or too flawed to come to the truth that they are so undeserving and terrible to even stand for freedom. Reagan did not play that game and the damage he caused to them will take a long time for them to come to terms with. They may feel it is a conspiracy and they may strike out, but until that reality and truth is absorbed, and then there is really nothing anyone can do but to let it play itself out. They will do everything they can or should to stop or prevent this failure and demise.

Fighting the Cold War was very difficult, selling it and communicating it so that others can accept it or support it was an impossible task. Richard Nixon found this out the hard way and he would have been best to have cleared the record and told the truth behind what he was trying to suggest by stealing, cheating or laying his way to power. This is not about liars but instead objectivism to liars or the truth. Can terrorists and spies sit in front of the world and make these claims for the populist movement while making it believable; if so what will be the vehicles or the machinery to easily manipulate and never question authority to investigate the truth? They had to hit the best and had to show themselves. They had to show what they were working on while condemning and forcing conformity which bordered on treason. There were also other events taking place all over the nation and movement. If you feel targeted, under surveillance, pressured, hit by a ton of bricks, and bombarded with integration theories or had total destruction set off to a road of surrender; then you have been in contact with this. It takes years to gather data and recover before being able to decipher the situation. These are little small art movements used to creep up and surprise others until they cannot fight nor do anything about it. They are intended to be automatic and triggers for series of events, thus require tremendous planning. Getting hit by it is one thing, having the wherewithal to continue the investigation or understand is another matter entirely. They abide by no rules or conventions, only pure meanness, lies, and deception.

By using the Jewish state as a satellite where the trail ends, all the Vietnam Generals were and are captured. Then using the vehicle of the populist movement to create debt and financial motives, condemnation and conformity became a way to pressure others into despair or surrender. The definition of insubordination and traitor had been reworked and redefined. Rights such as the first amendment were expanded and so was the Fifth Amendment. In the end, all the Vietnam Generals were captured, a desperate ploy to refinance the machinery which imploded, and the creation of a police state or satellite which would maneuver across international borders unannounced and without question. All of this was built on secrecy and lies by the left wing and the liberals. The socialists and communists felt Reagan’s Generals took them out and there was a large conspiracy and struggle with them which they had to disarm or neutralize. When his top officials past away, the answers were never delivered and remained in limbo while they struggled to figure out how to plug all the holes; before it was only suspicions and now it is pure paranoia. They know his Generals took them out.

It is very hard to investigate and avoid being hit by this liberal machinery which is under complete secrecy. Moreover, there is an undercurrent of privatization which complicates the ability to seek the necessary information, data, and truths to piece this together; mostly it is automatic and the defense is to hold back anyone from the core so that the maturation and combustion can occur. The other problem is the cross culture or the involvement of more than one nation. They are not going to give up secrets which threaten their own existence or reveal they are the opponent and the enemy. If a foreign nation is active in espionage or recruitment of saboteurs and misfits, then they are not going to provide any information which will threaten or shut down their operation.

There is a backup plan and this is insurance related. This insurance is backed up by federal guarantees, thus the widespread abuses of speculation and mismanagement. Some analysts even consider it looting the government in times of crisis. Others say it is refusal to aid socialist and communist political forces who are acting secretively to overthrow the nation. However, the privatization issue is insurance related and a compulsory insurance policy which encourages bad speculation by banks, looting, corruption, embezzlement, earmarks and pork, and a host of other financial grievances. The perpetrators are bipartisan and inclusive in political parties who have no exclusionary factors. All we know is how these legislators and politicians know much more than they are saying while they are kidnapping or placing others under surveillance asking the same. They are trying to reverse the years of Ronald Reagan; we are trying to understand it and all of those involved.

The reason why investigators and Cold Warriors are upset is because they shake their goods and taunt the defense forces indicating there is no way possible to catch them or bring them to justice. That is the audacity of liberalism; it has the confidence and boldness to be unstoppable. They ridicule others with lies and venomous scolding while telling them how they are on the verge of loosing their minds and in dire need of medication and medical attention. Medical attention is the result of injuries and getting hit with everything they have. These are thugs and criminal elements who feel they cannot be caught or captured. There is a sense of arrogance, conviction, and ignorance to them which is not as subtle as their political leaders. Simply put, they are lunatics and the closest representation to the devil this world has seen. This matter is insurance related and about insurance fraud which encourages a drift to utter failure.

Although we grieve about how turbulent history is and how it has erupted in certain periods of time, nobody would imagine the political forces on the left wing or liberalism to be using this turbulent history as a shield to promote socialism and communism. We agree to the word stop but they are not actually fighting for these causes, they are seeking the overthrow of the government based on economic motives or ideologies. They do not feel safe and feel threatened by capitalism, thus this shield of protection and safety net. This complacency makes it easy to manipulate the political system and those who are mentally ill or desperate for change in their life. These are not the leaders of the free world and they do not stand for freedom regardless of the political act they portray.

Part of the problem and the reason why the center of attention is directly nailed at the Reagan Administration has to do with the world’s policemen. Who are the world’s policemen and is there any agreement or sabotage? The liberals say it is them. The conservatives say it is them. Primarily, it is the goal of the left wing to reverse globalization and free trade because it encourages a higher order to govern this free trade and agreements. It forces nation states to behave and is able to disavow bad ones or rid them. So why the left wing is so angry about it or using it to sabotage and form more spy networks or rogue elements? This was the period after the Reagan era and it stressed militarism for good and bad. Liberals wish to be integrated. They have imploded and must have a second level in order to reintegrate. In other words, they have been exposed and a cause of tremendous suspicions; this must be neutralized or equalized somehow.

Warfare is becoming easier and high tech. Liberalism is beginning to dilute; hence the reliance on government is notwithstanding. How do you integrate and how do you promote liberalism in this type of political climate? The world’s police force is a good way and the best terrorist force is also a good way, advance the police state. Advance the idea of attacking others in the name of peace and progress for liberalism and left wing preservation. The only way to keep up with warfare or the Reagan Generals is to capture them, study them, clone them, and duplicate their operation. Of course it is fake and total phony, but this is about global domination, not the truth. They will not stop and do not have a choice to stop; they seek the overthrow of government and security for liberalism. That sense of peace and love which drives them to live in communes and study socialism or communism.

There is a problem with the left and that problem is they are dying. The resources and the means to support their political structure have exceeded the earth’s capacity to fulfill this promise of their politicians. Now they make terrible citizens, soldiers, and politicians because they are imploding and attacking because they have no other choice. If the liberals cannot do this nonviolently, then they will resort to force and violence much like the 1960s. We are seeing this and a merge with terrorism international. Terrorism international has always been a club of Europeans who are categorized as hit men rather than political terrorists. They are militant political groups who are for sale or solicit political business through shady or secretive operations to overthrow a legal order. When you cut the funds off or disrupt the budgets of these groups, their entire liberal political base is in a flux and scrambling to patch it. Over the course of three decades, we can analyze and determine what they are up to and what they have been doing; on the political level and how they are hitting federal forces to drive them back.

The earth’s capacity to support its population is in crisis. There are not enough jobs, food, oil, and other natural resources to go around. Governments are deep in dept and trying to militarize in order to either prevent invasion or invade. There is ideology to cope with this problem and many people are resorting to it rather than conservatism or right wing politics. Therefore, there is an effort to seek cooperation and a sense of being proud to be part of socialism or communism. Usually, this is some form of gift or payment; maybe even escape from capture or torture. The left has a militant wing and a peaceful wing; all work in unison to integrate and further this integration. However, mistakes at the highest levels are deadly as we are finding out. If there is any other symbol of the left and liberalism, it is failure and being total losers who some feel are brain dead or utterly flawed. Their appearance fluctuates according to these environmental changes and looks can be very deceiving. Mistakes at the highest levels are deadly but they will not turn on these problems or problematic groups. They are working on integrating them or advancing the cause.

The best way to describe the years following the rule of Ronald Reagan and the total collapse of the socialist and communist forces is vigilance and defiance. It is a period of obstructionism and advancing the idea of reintegration. It was believed a conspiracy was at work and therefore, the only way to reintegrate was to identify the conspiracy and eradicate it. It was considered a terrorist plot against the peace movement and the liberal elites. So this period of defiance was obstructionism, rebellions, conspiracy, re-arming, and reinvigorating for a show down. Those goals are intended to make it hard for any legal action or otherwise. It is harder to get in the way, snake up, pressure, obstruct, expose, tell the truth, and harder to fight this ad homonym reaction. This defiance will do whatever to push back the truth and the plot to expose them. If they are exposed they will be evicted from government and also security forces, they are not trusted and suspected of various suspicions. They claim they are terrified but hit federal forces like a ton of bricks; these are the same characteristics of union thugs and labor disputes.

Liberalism and laissez faire politics create reactionary movements. Some of the reactionary movements are terrorist related but it is difficult to determine who is doing what because the pursuit of truth or truth seeking is not present. It could be the devil itself up to the usual deceptions and lies. It might be some diabolic plot to blow up the world or kill as many innocent people as possible, nobody is certain. The liberals and the left wing are hanging on and defiant to the end. There is a greater struggle and a much more powerful ideology one step beyond socialism and communism and this is what the former Soviet premier described as Perestroika and Glasnost; it is liberalism and the populist movement. Many conservative experts have surmised it is a religion and not an ideological bearing. The question is how to legitimize, authorize, and legalize it when nobody wants it.

The best way to quell resistance or opposition is to form some relationship or vehicle to integrate and dilute the left wing and the right wing. Then the binds are strong enough, the entire monster can be allowed to drift. Free trade prevents this drift as people become more and more lazy. Liberals cannot compete in this world because of this drift and economic policy. They simply cannot compete and are hurt to the point of extreme violence. To them it is an insult, humiliation, racial supremacy, and an act of war. It is either that or admit they cannot compete or inferior. These are not the brightest human beings walking this earth nor are they the most peaceful regardless of what they claim.

When they began to push the idea of objectivism and objectivity, an unbiased or bipartisan idea, for liars or weakness; they stepped over the line with liars. From there on, the archaic structure is built around liberalism and enduring lies which are continuous. There is a brutality to the truth which liberals hate and a sense of ugliness they are unwilling to adopt. That brutality of truth forces them to be or trick others to become liars and thugs. It is a crazy quiet solitude while the militant wing riots and destroys. It is not just one or two groups; it is a huge conglomeration of them, a monopoly of wealthy elites. In seeking the integration of liars and thieves, the liberals were able to force the hand of Cold Warriors. This integration forced the admission of weakness or the inability to compete; either one competes or separate. When you admire liberal economic policy, it is inescapable and impossible to compete yet the mindset is tricked, geared, brainwashed, and lied to about being superior. It is insanity and lunacy packaged so that the public can readily adopt and be put asleep while the militant arm maneuvers and positions itself to overthrow the state. To overthrow the state, they must hit and hit like a ton of bricks the Reagan Generals and the best forces on earth with the hope they are too scared or will retreat too injured to return. It is the same strategic goals as union thuggery for the past one hundred years.

“Instead of operating within rules and law, we have been supplying lethal weapons to terrorist nations, trading arms for hostages, involving the U.S. government in military activity in direct contravention of the law, diverting public funds into private pockets and secret unofficial activities, selling access to the President for thousands of dollars, dispensing cash and foreign money orders out of a White House safe, accepting gifts and falsifying papers to cover it up, altering and shredding national security documents, lying the Congress. Now, I believe that the American people understand that democracy cannot withstand that kind of abuse.” - Representative Jack Brooks (D-Texas) investigating the Iran Contra hearings and oversight -

"When you got back to examining what they had done, they systematically destroyed and shredded all of the documentation, as much as they can get, hours of shredding, altering some of the documents that have remained, stole what they couldn't shred; now this gives you an indication that there maybe a few things that they didn't want the public to know." - Representative Jack Brooks (D-Texas) investigating the Iran Contra hearings and oversight –

Keep in mind, people were shocked and did not know what was going on when Iran Contra was blown apart. All they knew was these were Generals and Vietnam was elites, deep hard line Cold Warriors. Some feel Iran Contra was a set up to determine how strong the reaction would be and who the left would send. They were on the verge of being exposed and if they did not act, they would be dead. So the public was shocked to hear this and federal authorities felt betrayed by the right wing and most especially the conservatives.