(FROM "CATHERINE THE VOICE" ON RUSH LIMBAUGH BLOG)
I have always been like a “stud” stature. Even guys recognized or gave me unwanted attention to be good friends or support. It makes you feel good to be accepted and by the right people. There were so much pressures I had a nervous breakdown in 1988. One girl beat the other and they got more flawed and more gorgeous at the same time. If I picked one girl, another one would come along. After Ann in 1989, I ended all searches for any other woman, but I had to find her. I would have encounters coming back from the beach on my bike and I would talk to them to see what was up. 12/18/2008 2:36:05 PM what these women wanted, a protector huh? We are talking about a lot of girls and super gorgeous types with no weaknesses. This is why Ann is scared with me and nervous even after 20 years. She is not going to let them steal me. It is mind boggling, even married women do this and get weird with me. I was told they were “window shopping.” I walk in a room and feel it immediately; it is really annoying. I always confront them to scare them off.
After I had my crotch rocket for several years in high school, Catherine Moynihan had been tailing me while in high school and she lived 15 miles away, Irish Catholic, father was Navy officers, odd and bizarre behavior, always nervous around me, drop dead gorgeous at age 19. I had confronted her several times while in college, asked her out, and she flirted so I called her and she would never talk. She only wanted a face to face. She was acting erratic and hiding some secret. I was only allowed to talk to her sisters. I looked up her reputation and it was scary. They were sneaking around in my life. Yes Rush, these girls reacted “promiscuous” only with me, like I had an affect on them, and I was in a relationship; it felt as if they had a secret about me but they were A students and very pretty, very powerful families. 2:30:03 PM it was always like this and some were mad at me for giving them some lewd feeling they had to get my attention. Obviously, they are the so into striking out when you do not get what you want and turn into some other kind of human being. It was slowly being introduced to me and I ignored it.
I still do not know who the Pittsburgh girl, Lori, but that was about money only. She too was acting erratic and some secret but was even more gorgeous than Catherine in 2000. We are talking about some of the most gorgeous girls in America from the most powerful families. I do not wish to have any relationship with an Irish Catholic girl so Ann can have Hannity; you all do not know what quality is; I had wanted to know why she was trailing me back in high school. Back then I had a lot of pressures from girls and just chose the prettiest one and it was “practice hell.”
Ann reproduced and tries to have the same kind of life. She wants to beat anybody for my love. She knows what she is up against and who. Ann trumped them but I have not been happy how things are going with her support staff and stalkers but she capitalizes on it. I had felt like a total stud and after the Army I was so buff and so athletic they had to beg. I spoke to nobody, only Ann. I had no friends and cut off all my previous ones. Ann told me what they were up to and we played along to see where it would lead. That was 1990 to 2008; but I was only into marriage and family so I looked for Ann desperately but it was always blocked. We tried and were outfoxed or beat but did not give up, almost. It had gotten so fierce and deadly. Things were so out of control and we were so outnumbered.
So Ann duplicated and told my life story by using hers. She was an emissary to confront those behind this. Now I find she and both of our lives are a disaster and we both were kidnapped by this communist and terrorist cell. 2:13:04 PM I could not figure out who they were and what they wanted, they had been sneaking around with me. I always had a girlfriend since high school, always; and I never cheated but these girls were not joking. Find them and ask them if they were joking around. There is a lot these men do not know about.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
THE MOVIE: WHO DARES WINS (SYNOPSIS OF WHO ANN AND I ARE)
Who Dares Wins (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The Final Option" redirects here. For the Hong Kong film, see The Final Option (1994 film).
Synopsis
The British security forces learn that a militant group attached to the anti-nuclear movement plans a significant act of terrorism, however their plant is unmasked and publicly killed during a protest march. To find out what is being planned, they recruit the services of the SAS. SAS officer, Capt Peter Skellen (Lewis Collins) is picked for the mission. After faking his dismissal from the SAS for beating two visiting counter-terrorist officers in a mountain training exercise, he goes under cover to infiltrate the militant group by seducing its leader. Despite his convincing efforts, he is detected meeting his wife. Knowing this, the terrorists decide they can use Skellen as a part of their plan and do not let him know that he has been found out.
The group kills the secret service go between after tailing Skellen to a meeting and later take his wife and child hostage. Before he can report what he has learned to his superiors, the group hijacks a coach carrying a military band and use their uniforms to gain access to the American ambassador's residence. They take over the building and demand that a nuclear weapon be fired at the Holy Loch submarine base in Scotland. When it becomes clear that negotiations will not work, the SAS is sent in to deal with the terrorists. During the siege, Skellen is disarmed, but manages to send a Morse code light signal through a bathroom window. The SAS leader signals back that a raid will begin at 10 a.m., so Skellen can be prepared when the power is cut.
At the appointed time, Skellen disarms a terrorist. He kills several more in the dining room before rejoining his SAS colleagues who have now entered the house. At the end, he comes face to face with the group's leader. As he hesitates, she goes to kill him, but is killed by SAS soldiers.
The film ends in a politically divisive manner with an on-screen list of notable terrorist incidents accompanied by a menacing rendition of the British Labour Party's Red Flag anthem.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The Final Option" redirects here. For the Hong Kong film, see The Final Option (1994 film).
Synopsis
The British security forces learn that a militant group attached to the anti-nuclear movement plans a significant act of terrorism, however their plant is unmasked and publicly killed during a protest march. To find out what is being planned, they recruit the services of the SAS. SAS officer, Capt Peter Skellen (Lewis Collins) is picked for the mission. After faking his dismissal from the SAS for beating two visiting counter-terrorist officers in a mountain training exercise, he goes under cover to infiltrate the militant group by seducing its leader. Despite his convincing efforts, he is detected meeting his wife. Knowing this, the terrorists decide they can use Skellen as a part of their plan and do not let him know that he has been found out.
The group kills the secret service go between after tailing Skellen to a meeting and later take his wife and child hostage. Before he can report what he has learned to his superiors, the group hijacks a coach carrying a military band and use their uniforms to gain access to the American ambassador's residence. They take over the building and demand that a nuclear weapon be fired at the Holy Loch submarine base in Scotland. When it becomes clear that negotiations will not work, the SAS is sent in to deal with the terrorists. During the siege, Skellen is disarmed, but manages to send a Morse code light signal through a bathroom window. The SAS leader signals back that a raid will begin at 10 a.m., so Skellen can be prepared when the power is cut.
At the appointed time, Skellen disarms a terrorist. He kills several more in the dining room before rejoining his SAS colleagues who have now entered the house. At the end, he comes face to face with the group's leader. As he hesitates, she goes to kill him, but is killed by SAS soldiers.
The film ends in a politically divisive manner with an on-screen list of notable terrorist incidents accompanied by a menacing rendition of the British Labour Party's Red Flag anthem.
THE STORY OF MICHELLE MALKING (STILL UNCLEAR BUT LITTLE FISH FOR NOW)
12/17/2008 6:50:14 PM let me explain about Michelle Malkin. In 1985, I investigated and interviewed the internment of the Japanese during World War and spoke to several who were affected. Subsequent to this, Ronald Reagan sought to correct it and reimburse the Japanese for the millions of lost property. In 2002, I was arrested and interned very similar but only because I was about to expose this terror plot because they had pissed me off so badly and would not stop striking out when they did not get what they wanted. Now they did it again in 2006 and claim they will pay some reparation similar to the Japanese did. In 1996, a girl named “Stephanie DeLacruz” at George Mason University contacted me and subsequent to this, a long string of “Filipino” attempts to contact.
In 2006, it became very pervasive but I did not know what it was about. Now I know, it was intended to antagonize and “share” this left wing experience they had been and were trying to pick up on where they had left off. Not only were they doing it, they were also the support groups. You will see Michelle Malkin going against the Reagan decision and my investigation in 1985 while in 10th grade outside of Washington DC. This was near the time when they connected the dot with the Reagan administration and what my work was about; however, they were not prepared for what was to come. So they trailed like a phantom and hung around to see what they could suck off us or bad mouth us about and there was a lot tried. If you chased them and tried to grab them, they scatter and run, then come back menacingly. Rush and Sean was doing the exact same thing but Michelle Malkin antagonized my investigation after I was severely attacked and imprisoned not once but twice. The property damage has not even close to being addressed because it was a terror plot.
Also, Ann and I got together in 1989 and have been with each other since. We were secretly married and you can see the movie “Who Dares Wins”, before I entered the US Army. Had I stayed in the military, things would have been different. When I got back in 1993, Ann met up with me around Washington DC. Then I was done in 1998 with this fact finding and investigation. We were snatched immediately in 1997 before college was done. Then driven out of DC and imprisoned twice by the same terror plot. Ask the Bush Administration what they know about it and who was on guard. Ann did penetrate this terror network and seduced their leaders based on the information I was feeding her and what they were telling me or what I heard while kidnapped. She was listening in. If they said “chocolate” then she said “I love chocolate.” Things changed in 2002 and they made her debate the Vietnam War because I had told her, “Ann this is about the Vietnam War and bad feelings they had.” They wanted me to be their leader and used the terror attacks or striking out to make this easier. Michelle Malkin indicated how far back and how pissed off they were which dates back to the Reagan era while she claimed to be a Reagan supporter. The whole conservative movement has been hijacked by terrorists.
Don’t be gullible, Laura I., with the angel face, is even on in it and you cannot even see it. This is all about their church and the liberal movement and why the conservatives reject them or their efforts to help and hurt. We can only focus on those who are the leaders at this time until reinforcements arrive.
In 2006, it became very pervasive but I did not know what it was about. Now I know, it was intended to antagonize and “share” this left wing experience they had been and were trying to pick up on where they had left off. Not only were they doing it, they were also the support groups. You will see Michelle Malkin going against the Reagan decision and my investigation in 1985 while in 10th grade outside of Washington DC. This was near the time when they connected the dot with the Reagan administration and what my work was about; however, they were not prepared for what was to come. So they trailed like a phantom and hung around to see what they could suck off us or bad mouth us about and there was a lot tried. If you chased them and tried to grab them, they scatter and run, then come back menacingly. Rush and Sean was doing the exact same thing but Michelle Malkin antagonized my investigation after I was severely attacked and imprisoned not once but twice. The property damage has not even close to being addressed because it was a terror plot.
Also, Ann and I got together in 1989 and have been with each other since. We were secretly married and you can see the movie “Who Dares Wins”, before I entered the US Army. Had I stayed in the military, things would have been different. When I got back in 1993, Ann met up with me around Washington DC. Then I was done in 1998 with this fact finding and investigation. We were snatched immediately in 1997 before college was done. Then driven out of DC and imprisoned twice by the same terror plot. Ask the Bush Administration what they know about it and who was on guard. Ann did penetrate this terror network and seduced their leaders based on the information I was feeding her and what they were telling me or what I heard while kidnapped. She was listening in. If they said “chocolate” then she said “I love chocolate.” Things changed in 2002 and they made her debate the Vietnam War because I had told her, “Ann this is about the Vietnam War and bad feelings they had.” They wanted me to be their leader and used the terror attacks or striking out to make this easier. Michelle Malkin indicated how far back and how pissed off they were which dates back to the Reagan era while she claimed to be a Reagan supporter. The whole conservative movement has been hijacked by terrorists.
Don’t be gullible, Laura I., with the angel face, is even on in it and you cannot even see it. This is all about their church and the liberal movement and why the conservatives reject them or their efforts to help and hurt. We can only focus on those who are the leaders at this time until reinforcements arrive.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
IT IS AN ARMY OF REVOLUTIONARIES AND AGITATORS: AN ARMY OF EM
11/20/2008 11:11:32 PM
They hired high priced beggars to do a hit and then beg endlessly, endlessly. They are not shooting blanks and are pathological liars. While they beg, they call you liberals and one of them, the same crap. Now busted, I listen to them beg endlessly and must turn it off even if they some terrorist and people's revolution network. It is about poor people and they are not who they say they are. So I am super duper pissed off. But I understand after they beg and fail they hit and strike. It is a way of saying “do on to others as they do to you” and “an eye for an eye”; deadly. They stalk, pursue and terrorize you; then call you liberal and communists. They have no education and use it as an excuse. I told Ann it was an anti war and anti Vietnam vendetta; so she lay out the trap and looks that showed up. This was also why Bush chose Iraq. It was not to reaffirm Vietnam. It created divisions and so many problems but we support the military always, we are deep military families. They are driving a wedge. They said I was liberal. They said you were. They said I was warned. They said I did this or that. They kept pushing. They kept challenging you as their whore, even up to this day. They beg at the same time they push and push. They do not see this as nuts. They are some sort of spy and mole. Liars and frauds. They have so much to loose and they act this way? If it was me, I would get rid of them immediately so it does not spread. Now I have to and will get rid of everybody they spread it to and fool. Hey thank those jackass moles. They beg and beg and stalk and stalk. It is insane. They say it is a liberal assault and sacking of the nation on them; they are the unions.
They hired high priced beggars to do a hit and then beg endlessly, endlessly. They are not shooting blanks and are pathological liars. While they beg, they call you liberals and one of them, the same crap. Now busted, I listen to them beg endlessly and must turn it off even if they some terrorist and people's revolution network. It is about poor people and they are not who they say they are. So I am super duper pissed off. But I understand after they beg and fail they hit and strike. It is a way of saying “do on to others as they do to you” and “an eye for an eye”; deadly. They stalk, pursue and terrorize you; then call you liberal and communists. They have no education and use it as an excuse. I told Ann it was an anti war and anti Vietnam vendetta; so she lay out the trap and looks that showed up. This was also why Bush chose Iraq. It was not to reaffirm Vietnam. It created divisions and so many problems but we support the military always, we are deep military families. They are driving a wedge. They said I was liberal. They said you were. They said I was warned. They said I did this or that. They kept pushing. They kept challenging you as their whore, even up to this day. They beg at the same time they push and push. They do not see this as nuts. They are some sort of spy and mole. Liars and frauds. They have so much to loose and they act this way? If it was me, I would get rid of them immediately so it does not spread. Now I have to and will get rid of everybody they spread it to and fool. Hey thank those jackass moles. They beg and beg and stalk and stalk. It is insane. They say it is a liberal assault and sacking of the nation on them; they are the unions.
Friday, November 14, 2008
THE HISTORY OF THE BOOK TREASON BY ANN COULTER AND MCCARTHY
The history behind the book Treason by Ann Coulter dates back to the early 1990s. McCarhy and the psuedonym McCarthyism was a murky period where the Cold War, still undefined, sounded the alarms too late. However, was McCarthy the first spy hunter? He knew something was wrong and was worried that secrets were being lost to the USSR, specifically the Rosenberg's and the secrets of the atomic bomb.
Questions posed to Ann during long discussions was why this man targeted liberals and blacklisted Hollywood moguls. McCarthy is the energy behind the "Red Scare" and his legacy is noted in history books along with his favorite tool, blacklisting. The next spy master to loose his mind and to be unfairly or fairly treated is James Jesus Angelton. Angelton lost his mind and slipped into severe paranoia. McCarthy never described fully what he saw or knew, only how it was not popular and un-American. Was he ahead of his time? Was he just doing this for publicity? Was he an authentic Cold Warrior who was trapped in a time capsule?
Ann wrote this book to trace the history of spy hunters and conservatism. Again, conservatism cannot be traced back to the 1920s or during the red scare period. During Vietnam it was not a driving force. However, was conservatism incubating at the inner sanctum of the CIA and the 13th floors of the corridors of power? Liberalism was so strong, it was worthless to sound the alarms or even worry about liberals during the initial periods of the Cold War. McCarthyism was the first real introduction to this massive "tip" or trip into reality. McCarthy sounded the alarm loud enough to have an era named after him.
Ann Coulter is the one who revived his life and did the research on this topic. Also, treason goes to a part of the Constitution called "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" specifically direlection of duty during war time. The statute is vague but it does lists how this direlection of duty is categorized. Treason is only used during wartime to explain high crimes and misdemeanors, it is vague. Also, this was also the topic during other high level trials during the late 1980s.
My military speciality is satellites. The Verona satellite was released in 1995 and the secret photos were researched by myself as a precursor to the history of spy satellites and also the Bay of Pigs and Cuba. In 1995 as a college thesis, I studied the newly declassified satellite and photos belonging to Venona as a semester project. Verona was a first generation spy satellite manufactured by the CIA and with Kodak camera technology. Both Ann and I were working on this way back in the early 1990s and it was my military specialty. Venona is the branch of British and American code breakers who initially broke the Japanese and German cryptology in World War II.
You are looking at the person who taught Ann the basics of spy hunting and the Cold War. Living around DC and growing up there, experts were not hard to find and most especially when you have Generals who love you to death. Someone is using the populism of McCarthy to show Ann what the scare was about and how hysteria can be positive also. It is at an insanely jealous level at this time and I have asked her to put the lid on the grease fire.
While Ann wrote this book, I was falsely charged of being insane and were doing test to determine if I was mentally competent? do i look competent and honest? Both Ann and I had fallen victim to a trap by the liberals to exonerate themselves.
Questions posed to Ann during long discussions was why this man targeted liberals and blacklisted Hollywood moguls. McCarthy is the energy behind the "Red Scare" and his legacy is noted in history books along with his favorite tool, blacklisting. The next spy master to loose his mind and to be unfairly or fairly treated is James Jesus Angelton. Angelton lost his mind and slipped into severe paranoia. McCarthy never described fully what he saw or knew, only how it was not popular and un-American. Was he ahead of his time? Was he just doing this for publicity? Was he an authentic Cold Warrior who was trapped in a time capsule?
Ann wrote this book to trace the history of spy hunters and conservatism. Again, conservatism cannot be traced back to the 1920s or during the red scare period. During Vietnam it was not a driving force. However, was conservatism incubating at the inner sanctum of the CIA and the 13th floors of the corridors of power? Liberalism was so strong, it was worthless to sound the alarms or even worry about liberals during the initial periods of the Cold War. McCarthyism was the first real introduction to this massive "tip" or trip into reality. McCarthy sounded the alarm loud enough to have an era named after him.
Ann Coulter is the one who revived his life and did the research on this topic. Also, treason goes to a part of the Constitution called "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" specifically direlection of duty during war time. The statute is vague but it does lists how this direlection of duty is categorized. Treason is only used during wartime to explain high crimes and misdemeanors, it is vague. Also, this was also the topic during other high level trials during the late 1980s.
My military speciality is satellites. The Verona satellite was released in 1995 and the secret photos were researched by myself as a precursor to the history of spy satellites and also the Bay of Pigs and Cuba. In 1995 as a college thesis, I studied the newly declassified satellite and photos belonging to Venona as a semester project. Verona was a first generation spy satellite manufactured by the CIA and with Kodak camera technology. Both Ann and I were working on this way back in the early 1990s and it was my military specialty. Venona is the branch of British and American code breakers who initially broke the Japanese and German cryptology in World War II.
You are looking at the person who taught Ann the basics of spy hunting and the Cold War. Living around DC and growing up there, experts were not hard to find and most especially when you have Generals who love you to death. Someone is using the populism of McCarthy to show Ann what the scare was about and how hysteria can be positive also. It is at an insanely jealous level at this time and I have asked her to put the lid on the grease fire.
While Ann wrote this book, I was falsely charged of being insane and were doing test to determine if I was mentally competent? do i look competent and honest? Both Ann and I had fallen victim to a trap by the liberals to exonerate themselves.
Monday, November 3, 2008
ABOUT HER ONE TIME DATES: WHY OR WHAT THEY ARE ABOUT
11/3/2008 7:53:15 PM
Here is what Ann told me. When she went out with some guy who liked tennis, she is trying to say how I played tennis on the High School team and hit the ball with my entire arm as I jump in the air. I used to be famous for the speed of my aces and the near bullet of a one arm backhand which I perfected at age 14. I was obsessed with tennis. While in prison, I got a chance to play a professional ranked person who was also a bank robber. One incident was a fight in the court yard with a one eyed psycho who had been in so many fights. He was suggesting how he would take me and stick me if he wanted. So one day, he told me to get off the tennis court and I began to serve my 120 and 130 mph serves at him nearly missing him. He did not challenge me and left and we had another show down later in the week which I showed him a kick to the ear. The next morning he dumped coffee on someone after heating it to near vapor and seriously wounded someone. After that they never allowed him to roam free again. They took Ann's "profile" of her man and her clue to suggest she had been romantically involved by one date. It is a first date thing, either it works or it was just friends. That is what she told me and she said she never really dated this tennis guy the media rumored about. I knew it was Ann trying to talk to me. I read afterwards what she was trying to say. Ann is and has been in a relationship so if she was interested, the other person would say so, she is not and has not, but she was also trying to say how she was taken so the pressure to court her or marry her would ease up. Now they knew she was lying or was mad at them. If Ann was romantically interested or romantically involved, it would have shown up and it never did. The prison scene is in the movie “School for Scoundrels” which depicts prison as a college for felons. They were supposed to help Ann relieve the pressure of mourning and attacked as single. Did they help or hurt? You judge. What they did was kept their mouths shut and it drifted badly into rumors. Now I have to defend her.
Here is what Ann told me. When she went out with some guy who liked tennis, she is trying to say how I played tennis on the High School team and hit the ball with my entire arm as I jump in the air. I used to be famous for the speed of my aces and the near bullet of a one arm backhand which I perfected at age 14. I was obsessed with tennis. While in prison, I got a chance to play a professional ranked person who was also a bank robber. One incident was a fight in the court yard with a one eyed psycho who had been in so many fights. He was suggesting how he would take me and stick me if he wanted. So one day, he told me to get off the tennis court and I began to serve my 120 and 130 mph serves at him nearly missing him. He did not challenge me and left and we had another show down later in the week which I showed him a kick to the ear. The next morning he dumped coffee on someone after heating it to near vapor and seriously wounded someone. After that they never allowed him to roam free again. They took Ann's "profile" of her man and her clue to suggest she had been romantically involved by one date. It is a first date thing, either it works or it was just friends. That is what she told me and she said she never really dated this tennis guy the media rumored about. I knew it was Ann trying to talk to me. I read afterwards what she was trying to say. Ann is and has been in a relationship so if she was interested, the other person would say so, she is not and has not, but she was also trying to say how she was taken so the pressure to court her or marry her would ease up. Now they knew she was lying or was mad at them. If Ann was romantically interested or romantically involved, it would have shown up and it never did. The prison scene is in the movie “School for Scoundrels” which depicts prison as a college for felons. They were supposed to help Ann relieve the pressure of mourning and attacked as single. Did they help or hurt? You judge. What they did was kept their mouths shut and it drifted badly into rumors. Now I have to defend her.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
ANN AND I HAVE RESOLVED THE MATTER: IT IS SOME LYNCHING AND LYING TO FOMENT ANGER AND A MOB
10/29/2008 2:54:39 AM
Look, the only person who has a right to be mad about Ann and her private life is me. There are times I get very mad at her only to find out that the report of the belly t shirt in the LA restaurant on April of 2007 was not even true and she never was there. Or when some con man named Rob Ryan, who broke in my email account to change a letter he had sent me about this absurd idea he had a beer with Ann and slept in her apartment for months was an ambush. Rob told one story and then the email changed again.
Ann and I fight. However, deep down, I would rather have the best for her. If I and her fight so much and cannot live with each other, then I let her live her life and move on. This is a woman I have spent ten of my best years with. I will beg and get on my knees with the most desperate begging if she is ever injured. I spent 10 of the most nightmarish years with her while we both were attacked daily. I just want her home and the thought of the best years of your life make you beg. So I beg, not for her but also to her. But her love is strong and she will not let go.
If it comes down to it; come to me and let me beg. Let her be. It is a hatred of women and a jealousy because of a vendetta with the Clintons. Then it was lies printed about her and her touching off a feud. I begged in 2002 and it got me three years in federal prison. Ann is a good person and I vowed to protect her even if I am so angry and upset. Even if it was a matter of infidelity or a swinger issue which they had lynched her in the media, I would still beg if I had to. She gave me 10 of the most wonderful years of my life before I was kidnapped and vowed never to back down again.
Ann is a good person and as I said, is only belligerent because of what happened to us who prevented our courtship and marriage. I did not do anything wrong and she did not do anything wrong but nobody judged her for her career and work; they were more interested in lynching her for being a good person. I figured the best way is to break the bond between us and maybe she will follow or stop the lynching of her. If I have to I will beg for her. At the same time, whoever are my tormentor and kidnapper, you are taking away ten of the best years of Ann’s life.
If you felt kidnapping and threatening me would get you a slam dunk, then it did not work. Ann will always jump right in there like the secret service. You do not understand her, I do. She listens to me and I hurt for her sometimes. I am scared of her and for her because she thinks she is my secret service and she is not, so I beg for her and have in the past. She does not have the killer instinct or the physical ability I have but her mental strength is invincible. You will not break her and you will not break me. But I will beg for her so that she is treated fairly and that is a pride I can live with. Whoever wrote all these lies about her or began some public lynching of her; you are wrong and are a fool.
She beat you in the end and that caused you to stalk her and to loose your mind. She turned your delirious hatred of her against you by upsetting and making you so jealous you stalk her and lie to me about her. She beat you because she is a good person and has a noble cause, me. The story and the lynching of Ann changed to being our best friends and wishing to promote us. Yet they are in step when they do not even respect the laws and Constitution which says that an individual has a right to exist.
As a stalker, you all have no right to be mad at her or think she is even interested. She has told me that never once was she romantically interested and was trying to relay this. There is a lot about her I do not like but she has vowed to fix it if she can. Half the stuff is not even true and if it is, they should come forward before we go after them. That is how they lynched her and it began back in 1999 and 2000 after impeachment and several attempts to investigate her own private life. They knew they hit gold when I began to fax reports after 911 of chasing and being chased by a suspect. So they said I was crazy and Ann got back for that one and we have not resolved the false imprisonment and threats.
Let me worry about her private life and her sex life. I can tell you that we are very happy until I get some article and find out it is a total lie or some orchestrated effort to spread rumors which she says began with the New York Post. We can imagine what her father felt reading it, imagine what I felt reading it for the first time. She has said and repeated she is not interested and only used dates to signal this fact. When a woman is asked out and she is not interested, most of them say “I have a boyfriend” even if they do not or they get one just to say they have one. It is clear, to me, that Ann decided to fight the fire with fire while I was gone and MIA.
Our life has been hell for ten years but we fight side by side with the idea that those 10 of the most wonderful years will return again one day. Of course I get mad at Ann and of course she gets mad at me, but that is our fight and we do not hate each other; but her stalkers feel I am invading her life and was forced to change their tune (Rush, Sean, Caldera, Maher, a few black guys, Clinton, Edwards, and a few others; it was an Army of them and the media.) First their story was about lynching me, then it was her, and now it is back to promoting us or being bad subordinates. That is the problem with criminals, terrorists, psychopaths, and social paths; they never know when they have been caught and defeated. If and when Ann and I are together, things will fix it. This problem will go away very quick; very quick.
Alex (and I do love Ann very much but am not allowed to show it due to our problems and a history that refuses to go away or fix it now.)
Look, the only person who has a right to be mad about Ann and her private life is me. There are times I get very mad at her only to find out that the report of the belly t shirt in the LA restaurant on April of 2007 was not even true and she never was there. Or when some con man named Rob Ryan, who broke in my email account to change a letter he had sent me about this absurd idea he had a beer with Ann and slept in her apartment for months was an ambush. Rob told one story and then the email changed again.
Ann and I fight. However, deep down, I would rather have the best for her. If I and her fight so much and cannot live with each other, then I let her live her life and move on. This is a woman I have spent ten of my best years with. I will beg and get on my knees with the most desperate begging if she is ever injured. I spent 10 of the most nightmarish years with her while we both were attacked daily. I just want her home and the thought of the best years of your life make you beg. So I beg, not for her but also to her. But her love is strong and she will not let go.
If it comes down to it; come to me and let me beg. Let her be. It is a hatred of women and a jealousy because of a vendetta with the Clintons. Then it was lies printed about her and her touching off a feud. I begged in 2002 and it got me three years in federal prison. Ann is a good person and I vowed to protect her even if I am so angry and upset. Even if it was a matter of infidelity or a swinger issue which they had lynched her in the media, I would still beg if I had to. She gave me 10 of the most wonderful years of my life before I was kidnapped and vowed never to back down again.
Ann is a good person and as I said, is only belligerent because of what happened to us who prevented our courtship and marriage. I did not do anything wrong and she did not do anything wrong but nobody judged her for her career and work; they were more interested in lynching her for being a good person. I figured the best way is to break the bond between us and maybe she will follow or stop the lynching of her. If I have to I will beg for her. At the same time, whoever are my tormentor and kidnapper, you are taking away ten of the best years of Ann’s life.
If you felt kidnapping and threatening me would get you a slam dunk, then it did not work. Ann will always jump right in there like the secret service. You do not understand her, I do. She listens to me and I hurt for her sometimes. I am scared of her and for her because she thinks she is my secret service and she is not, so I beg for her and have in the past. She does not have the killer instinct or the physical ability I have but her mental strength is invincible. You will not break her and you will not break me. But I will beg for her so that she is treated fairly and that is a pride I can live with. Whoever wrote all these lies about her or began some public lynching of her; you are wrong and are a fool.
She beat you in the end and that caused you to stalk her and to loose your mind. She turned your delirious hatred of her against you by upsetting and making you so jealous you stalk her and lie to me about her. She beat you because she is a good person and has a noble cause, me. The story and the lynching of Ann changed to being our best friends and wishing to promote us. Yet they are in step when they do not even respect the laws and Constitution which says that an individual has a right to exist.
As a stalker, you all have no right to be mad at her or think she is even interested. She has told me that never once was she romantically interested and was trying to relay this. There is a lot about her I do not like but she has vowed to fix it if she can. Half the stuff is not even true and if it is, they should come forward before we go after them. That is how they lynched her and it began back in 1999 and 2000 after impeachment and several attempts to investigate her own private life. They knew they hit gold when I began to fax reports after 911 of chasing and being chased by a suspect. So they said I was crazy and Ann got back for that one and we have not resolved the false imprisonment and threats.
Let me worry about her private life and her sex life. I can tell you that we are very happy until I get some article and find out it is a total lie or some orchestrated effort to spread rumors which she says began with the New York Post. We can imagine what her father felt reading it, imagine what I felt reading it for the first time. She has said and repeated she is not interested and only used dates to signal this fact. When a woman is asked out and she is not interested, most of them say “I have a boyfriend” even if they do not or they get one just to say they have one. It is clear, to me, that Ann decided to fight the fire with fire while I was gone and MIA.
Our life has been hell for ten years but we fight side by side with the idea that those 10 of the most wonderful years will return again one day. Of course I get mad at Ann and of course she gets mad at me, but that is our fight and we do not hate each other; but her stalkers feel I am invading her life and was forced to change their tune (Rush, Sean, Caldera, Maher, a few black guys, Clinton, Edwards, and a few others; it was an Army of them and the media.) First their story was about lynching me, then it was her, and now it is back to promoting us or being bad subordinates. That is the problem with criminals, terrorists, psychopaths, and social paths; they never know when they have been caught and defeated. If and when Ann and I are together, things will fix it. This problem will go away very quick; very quick.
Alex (and I do love Ann very much but am not allowed to show it due to our problems and a history that refuses to go away or fix it now.)
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
ANN RESPONDS WITH A RESPECTABLE ANSWER: IT WAS A LIE AGAIN (ENDLESS LYING)
10/28/2008 7:24:31 PM
Ann, this is not the time to pull a fast one on me or protect rapists, socialists, liars, and people who sack and hate the Constitution and hard work. When you say less than 10, you mean less than 10 date ever. So if nobody got a second date, then Ann has only been on a date with 10 people or so. Please facts check that. She did not kiss anybody, she did not go to their house, and she says it was just a dinner date, not a real date such as dinner and a movie. Now see, I can love someone and cherish someone who is not embarrassed about their secret life. 10 dates or about 10 people; all fake and not real dates, social, photo op, orchestrated, etc… to fix or build on an image while attacked. That is the key, while attacked. How does the stalker problem happen Ann, did they say to you “we will kill him if you do not stop the attacks or back down?” They made that ultimatum to me Ann about you; what did they say to you? It was Rush and the politico.com conspiracy, they are guilty. Did they use you or me to bargain or extort some decision or some sort of rape or socialism? A bail out… you are all entangled in it Ann. (She has 1000 or more dinner offers and dates, 10 and not 50 dates). No secret life yet; this is crazy, and she is really scary and likes risk taking. 10 dates, ten losers, no second dates, nothing… just dinner and conversation or interview; an essential or critical move on Ann’s life to lessen attacks or help me; no personal enjoyment or intention of it leading to romance or second date. Did they say give us this or that… technology, secrets, SDI, satellite info, war secrets, or our work?
Ann, this is not the time to pull a fast one on me or protect rapists, socialists, liars, and people who sack and hate the Constitution and hard work. When you say less than 10, you mean less than 10 date ever. So if nobody got a second date, then Ann has only been on a date with 10 people or so. Please facts check that. She did not kiss anybody, she did not go to their house, and she says it was just a dinner date, not a real date such as dinner and a movie. Now see, I can love someone and cherish someone who is not embarrassed about their secret life. 10 dates or about 10 people; all fake and not real dates, social, photo op, orchestrated, etc… to fix or build on an image while attacked. That is the key, while attacked. How does the stalker problem happen Ann, did they say to you “we will kill him if you do not stop the attacks or back down?” They made that ultimatum to me Ann about you; what did they say to you? It was Rush and the politico.com conspiracy, they are guilty. Did they use you or me to bargain or extort some decision or some sort of rape or socialism? A bail out… you are all entangled in it Ann. (She has 1000 or more dinner offers and dates, 10 and not 50 dates). No secret life yet; this is crazy, and she is really scary and likes risk taking. 10 dates, ten losers, no second dates, nothing… just dinner and conversation or interview; an essential or critical move on Ann’s life to lessen attacks or help me; no personal enjoyment or intention of it leading to romance or second date. Did they say give us this or that… technology, secrets, SDI, satellite info, war secrets, or our work?
ANN AND HER LIFE IS DRIVING ME CRAZY: IT IS STALKER, RAPIST, AND FREAK SHOW
10/28/2008 4:47:55 PM
I want to get away from Ann; she has more stalkers on her than I have ever seen and they are not shooting blanks. She refuses and tells me they are driving me away from her as she did them. Every single person from Clear Channel is avoiding her work and claims she is their girl and their whore. Anybody who promoted politico.com from April to October 2008 along with their staff is guilty of conspiracy. Rush admitted to this and said he would take the credit. Nothing clear channel was stalking Ann had to do with her work but they were asked if they were trying to rape her and said yes. There is so much corruption going on you be disgusted; they do not believe in the Constitution, they use it to sack it. They do not respect the good works of others or when they are not interested. They have circled Ann but for the wrong reasons.
(McCain is also in it and Ann went after him way back in 2000: my kidnapping to solve the black issue with socialism). Hannity, Limbaugh, Caldera and a lot of Ann's own friends are guilty and I cannot stand Ann, she is promoting her own rape. I see her as a dumb victim and a good mistress for sloppy seconds. She claims this was just good clean fun, she is being lynched and we are in tremendous danger. I am well aware and have been under attack and kidnapped for a decade. I have over 12,000 terrorist hits logged. As broken as I am and as disgusted as I am with Ann, I have said clearly; what she is guilty of. She caught my stalkers and the people behind this but in doing so is hiding what she did and how she did it. I am going crazy dealing with Rush mostly and her god damn friends. Her name appears right next to them and I want to puke. They do not believe in hard work or the Constitution; I wonder if Ann does. Meanwhile, I am dealing with her stalkers who have identified themselves; Sean, Rush, Caldera, Maher, and Kause. They were spying on her not about politics but sex and dirt; to revenge the Clinton scandal and some socialist coup.
They claim to be a cupid and matchmaker but when she said she is obsessed with me; they cut me off and a surge of attacks from the Clinton's began. They were on her immediately and me, but Rush had been on me for years before messing with my head to defect and accept socialism; he knows stuff back in the early 1990s. They do not believe in the individual and the right to exist and this is their way to test or to soften others to be a puppet while they copy our words and work. Ann is like my secret service and she will never stop. I have to use force on her at times or beg her and I have given up, it does not work. I just want her home safe and if someone has to be sacrificed, it will be me. I argue with Ann about this and the rule is, I keep her afloat and feel no pain ever. I feel pain when she gets her priorities wrong.
She owes me a lot more than a few lines or hypocrisy but she views love as some game also. She is doing it to me and I am fed up and going crazy with her. Now they stopped lynching me and focused on her. I begged her and tried everything, I do not know what to do. I have yelled at her, scolded her, made her hurt and feel guilt, made her cry, etc... I do not know what to do and I was banned from her life by Rush supposedly for some reason.
Ann has given me ten of the most wonderful years of my life and was waiting while ten more extinguished it. She has been so patient and said she will wait forever if she has to which is actually my line. I will die lonely than surrender. It is crystal clear and I have done all I can for Ann; but she lies to me also and bawls her eyes out about love, marriage and family. Swingers are the best wives and that is how she got in this situation. She witnessed and did some cut her hair and destroy herself self destruction. This was her way of saying, I have a boyfriend and not interested.
Ann is driving me crazy and I have tried to do my duty and clear the record even if I am so overwhelmed by problems, legal problems, and the enemy is crawling all over. Ann knows how bad I got it and how much more I was fighting and now she just bends over and promotes them; good bye Ann. I am going nuts and she is enjoying the widow status way too much; she knows who did it. That is why they are after her and will do her in also. It is a death threat and there is a lot of reason to use force on them but they claim we cannot be exonerated. I is driving me crazy by professing her love to me but she knows I am dead and it will be game over. She is a lawyer who is defending two sides over party line; Ann is not corrupt but she is surrounded and exploited by shit bags.
Ann is believed to be working with rapists, sex offenders, pedophiles, liars, corrupt people, and stalkers because they threatened her using me and I am getting disgusted with her. I beg her to come home and that is all. I literally beg her; she gave me 10 of the most wonderful years of my life and so much peace. We never argue and we argue now, she was lynched and I was severely wronged. We ran into some socialist coup and they struck us down. They not shooting blanks either and I have tried to beg for Ann because she will never. We try everything.
She says she had to be some social swinger because we were protected and being lynched, murdered is a better word. The way to her was her spouse. Squeeze Limbaugh and he will unravel it all. Squeeze Clear Channel and the network will wilt; it is their ass, choose. The nation will be turned upside down while they do anything to be reelected; even forcing blacks on others and telling people they are black. You are black what will you do to get out of this death trap.
I want to get away from Ann; she has more stalkers on her than I have ever seen and they are not shooting blanks. She refuses and tells me they are driving me away from her as she did them. Every single person from Clear Channel is avoiding her work and claims she is their girl and their whore. Anybody who promoted politico.com from April to October 2008 along with their staff is guilty of conspiracy. Rush admitted to this and said he would take the credit. Nothing clear channel was stalking Ann had to do with her work but they were asked if they were trying to rape her and said yes. There is so much corruption going on you be disgusted; they do not believe in the Constitution, they use it to sack it. They do not respect the good works of others or when they are not interested. They have circled Ann but for the wrong reasons.
(McCain is also in it and Ann went after him way back in 2000: my kidnapping to solve the black issue with socialism). Hannity, Limbaugh, Caldera and a lot of Ann's own friends are guilty and I cannot stand Ann, she is promoting her own rape. I see her as a dumb victim and a good mistress for sloppy seconds. She claims this was just good clean fun, she is being lynched and we are in tremendous danger. I am well aware and have been under attack and kidnapped for a decade. I have over 12,000 terrorist hits logged. As broken as I am and as disgusted as I am with Ann, I have said clearly; what she is guilty of. She caught my stalkers and the people behind this but in doing so is hiding what she did and how she did it. I am going crazy dealing with Rush mostly and her god damn friends. Her name appears right next to them and I want to puke. They do not believe in hard work or the Constitution; I wonder if Ann does. Meanwhile, I am dealing with her stalkers who have identified themselves; Sean, Rush, Caldera, Maher, and Kause. They were spying on her not about politics but sex and dirt; to revenge the Clinton scandal and some socialist coup.
They claim to be a cupid and matchmaker but when she said she is obsessed with me; they cut me off and a surge of attacks from the Clinton's began. They were on her immediately and me, but Rush had been on me for years before messing with my head to defect and accept socialism; he knows stuff back in the early 1990s. They do not believe in the individual and the right to exist and this is their way to test or to soften others to be a puppet while they copy our words and work. Ann is like my secret service and she will never stop. I have to use force on her at times or beg her and I have given up, it does not work. I just want her home safe and if someone has to be sacrificed, it will be me. I argue with Ann about this and the rule is, I keep her afloat and feel no pain ever. I feel pain when she gets her priorities wrong.
She owes me a lot more than a few lines or hypocrisy but she views love as some game also. She is doing it to me and I am fed up and going crazy with her. Now they stopped lynching me and focused on her. I begged her and tried everything, I do not know what to do. I have yelled at her, scolded her, made her hurt and feel guilt, made her cry, etc... I do not know what to do and I was banned from her life by Rush supposedly for some reason.
Ann has given me ten of the most wonderful years of my life and was waiting while ten more extinguished it. She has been so patient and said she will wait forever if she has to which is actually my line. I will die lonely than surrender. It is crystal clear and I have done all I can for Ann; but she lies to me also and bawls her eyes out about love, marriage and family. Swingers are the best wives and that is how she got in this situation. She witnessed and did some cut her hair and destroy herself self destruction. This was her way of saying, I have a boyfriend and not interested.
Ann is driving me crazy and I have tried to do my duty and clear the record even if I am so overwhelmed by problems, legal problems, and the enemy is crawling all over. Ann knows how bad I got it and how much more I was fighting and now she just bends over and promotes them; good bye Ann. I am going nuts and she is enjoying the widow status way too much; she knows who did it. That is why they are after her and will do her in also. It is a death threat and there is a lot of reason to use force on them but they claim we cannot be exonerated. I is driving me crazy by professing her love to me but she knows I am dead and it will be game over. She is a lawyer who is defending two sides over party line; Ann is not corrupt but she is surrounded and exploited by shit bags.
Ann is believed to be working with rapists, sex offenders, pedophiles, liars, corrupt people, and stalkers because they threatened her using me and I am getting disgusted with her. I beg her to come home and that is all. I literally beg her; she gave me 10 of the most wonderful years of my life and so much peace. We never argue and we argue now, she was lynched and I was severely wronged. We ran into some socialist coup and they struck us down. They not shooting blanks either and I have tried to beg for Ann because she will never. We try everything.
She says she had to be some social swinger because we were protected and being lynched, murdered is a better word. The way to her was her spouse. Squeeze Limbaugh and he will unravel it all. Squeeze Clear Channel and the network will wilt; it is their ass, choose. The nation will be turned upside down while they do anything to be reelected; even forcing blacks on others and telling people they are black. You are black what will you do to get out of this death trap.
THE TIDE HAS TURNED AND ANN IS RUNNING OUT OF TIME: SHE IS ALWAYS LIKE THAT ALWAYS
... (continued letter)
10/28/2008 4:08:15 AM
I am not like these people or claim to be or want to be. They all can rot in hell; Ann can rot with them even. Here is the truth. Ann owes me ten times more than what I owe her. Even still, I am very disturbed by her life and I have asked her to clear this up immediately. Even though she owes me ten times more, I have never once asked for any sort of repayment and still refuse any. I told her I would get her out and clear her professional name. I would be lying if I said I was not mad (she said I was stalking her on politico while her stalkers were beginning to cloud on me) and it made me hate her so much for lying about me, so much. I still do not hold it against her and ask for any repayment. I am still fighting crazy and doing what I can so that I can have a chance to escape my predicament. I am not into this swinging shit or the date makes the person Ann is into. It is pitiful. She thinks she is in competition with younger women to win my heart.
So far, she is batting zero and all she does is come crying to me and I have held back my feelings and promised her that 10 can be 20 I do not care. I will get her out of this but I will choose if I shall mourn her or not. You do not want to know how much she owes me and how angered I am hearing about her dating life and life while I was on my death bed. Good clean fun or not, if I did that I could not live with myself. I would not be able to look at her eye to eye. I did not do this for her repayment or so she cans prove herself and how many wounds she has to me. You are in her sick joke so she can prove herself to me and how she is all cut up and bleeding like me. I am trying to escape a kidnapping and abduction and Ann has laid on me a huge problem with her private and social swinging life which I abject to vehemently. She said she would sit down and outlines every detail but has yet and claims it was good clean fun. If I did that, I would be hung and could not look her in the eye. She said I was stalking her on politico which got me in trouble with her real stalkers. Now she says she is seeking an apology on there. In all honesty, I am getting sick and tired of this charade. She is too quiet isn't she? I am not happy with her private life and she is out to prove herself and her reputation, she is too worried about her damn reputation or how many friends she has or how powerful and rich her dates are.
Here is my recent letter to her and my final judgment: I do not care whether or not it was good clean fun or not. I do not owe you nothing and you owe me 20 times what you have done for me but I do not want your money, your life, your problems, or the strings attacked to it. I do this for my own soul and because I been with her for 20 years. She can follow me to the ends of this earth and give me all the money in the world, it will not heal my soul. She got enough problems right now to worry about who or what she is dating. If she is that pissed off, then run around with black men for the rest of her life and that will piss off all her enemies and friends. Oh she pissed me off also and owes me 20 times more but I do not ask or want nothing. I am doing it for my own soul so I do not have to live with this guilt and anger. If she wants to die angry miserable and broken, then so be it. She always shows up a little too late and without enough ammo to work with. Now I have all these legal cases and where is she? Arguing with me about how many times she was asked out or went to dinner. I am just disgusted altogether but I know I am a good spouse and a good person, to Ann Coulter even. She messed up her own life and very close now to loosing the last person, the last person who holds it all... she will loose everything. It is not my fault, not my fault and I do not owe her anything; she owes me twenty times. Tell Ann if she wants to blame someone, look in the mirror and look at what happened on politico with her stalkers, then she was screaming about how I was stalking her. It is on her soul and burns her soul; not mine.
"I have a massive problem with stalkers. You obviously have a worse problem with stalkers. They turn out to be the same people and who knew we were together sort of. Ann you fragged my ass when I read the stuff and was fact checking. One side is what you created which was false. The other side was what was created for you which was even more false. Then there were the ones who created fantasy and hovered over you for a chance or way to figure out what was true or not. Every time you are asked, you give the most blatant lies. Everytime a rumor surfaces, you never answer directly. They know you are buying time or waiting for some deliverance, like a rescue or surprise. Maybe they will understand the reasons or why you choose to do that, it is dangerous. Here is what i think. They know you have a man. They heard you say life long crush and ex boyfriend. Time of your life. Your mom and dad. Your commitment to marriage and family. However, they cannot piece together anything and what they can is what you say and what frustrates and upsets them. They know you are not telling the truth and are hiding something. You were not acting like a single woman, visiting single places, socializing like a single woman, nothing suggested that you were "looking." The people you frequently choose for appearances are married or ridiculous as a date for a single woman and more of a chaperone. Maybe I "fit to well" in the analysis. Maybe my time line is just too perfect. Maybe we write nearly identical. Maybe it is obvious you are with a person whose profile can be built up by what they know about you. Based on what you have said, I am unable to build that profile; I asked if you were on drugs. It was just hogwash. "
10/28/2008 4:08:15 AM
I am not like these people or claim to be or want to be. They all can rot in hell; Ann can rot with them even. Here is the truth. Ann owes me ten times more than what I owe her. Even still, I am very disturbed by her life and I have asked her to clear this up immediately. Even though she owes me ten times more, I have never once asked for any sort of repayment and still refuse any. I told her I would get her out and clear her professional name. I would be lying if I said I was not mad (she said I was stalking her on politico while her stalkers were beginning to cloud on me) and it made me hate her so much for lying about me, so much. I still do not hold it against her and ask for any repayment. I am still fighting crazy and doing what I can so that I can have a chance to escape my predicament. I am not into this swinging shit or the date makes the person Ann is into. It is pitiful. She thinks she is in competition with younger women to win my heart.
So far, she is batting zero and all she does is come crying to me and I have held back my feelings and promised her that 10 can be 20 I do not care. I will get her out of this but I will choose if I shall mourn her or not. You do not want to know how much she owes me and how angered I am hearing about her dating life and life while I was on my death bed. Good clean fun or not, if I did that I could not live with myself. I would not be able to look at her eye to eye. I did not do this for her repayment or so she cans prove herself and how many wounds she has to me. You are in her sick joke so she can prove herself to me and how she is all cut up and bleeding like me. I am trying to escape a kidnapping and abduction and Ann has laid on me a huge problem with her private and social swinging life which I abject to vehemently. She said she would sit down and outlines every detail but has yet and claims it was good clean fun. If I did that, I would be hung and could not look her in the eye. She said I was stalking her on politico which got me in trouble with her real stalkers. Now she says she is seeking an apology on there. In all honesty, I am getting sick and tired of this charade. She is too quiet isn't she? I am not happy with her private life and she is out to prove herself and her reputation, she is too worried about her damn reputation or how many friends she has or how powerful and rich her dates are.
Here is my recent letter to her and my final judgment: I do not care whether or not it was good clean fun or not. I do not owe you nothing and you owe me 20 times what you have done for me but I do not want your money, your life, your problems, or the strings attacked to it. I do this for my own soul and because I been with her for 20 years. She can follow me to the ends of this earth and give me all the money in the world, it will not heal my soul. She got enough problems right now to worry about who or what she is dating. If she is that pissed off, then run around with black men for the rest of her life and that will piss off all her enemies and friends. Oh she pissed me off also and owes me 20 times more but I do not ask or want nothing. I am doing it for my own soul so I do not have to live with this guilt and anger. If she wants to die angry miserable and broken, then so be it. She always shows up a little too late and without enough ammo to work with. Now I have all these legal cases and where is she? Arguing with me about how many times she was asked out or went to dinner. I am just disgusted altogether but I know I am a good spouse and a good person, to Ann Coulter even. She messed up her own life and very close now to loosing the last person, the last person who holds it all... she will loose everything. It is not my fault, not my fault and I do not owe her anything; she owes me twenty times. Tell Ann if she wants to blame someone, look in the mirror and look at what happened on politico with her stalkers, then she was screaming about how I was stalking her. It is on her soul and burns her soul; not mine.
"I have a massive problem with stalkers. You obviously have a worse problem with stalkers. They turn out to be the same people and who knew we were together sort of. Ann you fragged my ass when I read the stuff and was fact checking. One side is what you created which was false. The other side was what was created for you which was even more false. Then there were the ones who created fantasy and hovered over you for a chance or way to figure out what was true or not. Every time you are asked, you give the most blatant lies. Everytime a rumor surfaces, you never answer directly. They know you are buying time or waiting for some deliverance, like a rescue or surprise. Maybe they will understand the reasons or why you choose to do that, it is dangerous. Here is what i think. They know you have a man. They heard you say life long crush and ex boyfriend. Time of your life. Your mom and dad. Your commitment to marriage and family. However, they cannot piece together anything and what they can is what you say and what frustrates and upsets them. They know you are not telling the truth and are hiding something. You were not acting like a single woman, visiting single places, socializing like a single woman, nothing suggested that you were "looking." The people you frequently choose for appearances are married or ridiculous as a date for a single woman and more of a chaperone. Maybe I "fit to well" in the analysis. Maybe my time line is just too perfect. Maybe we write nearly identical. Maybe it is obvious you are with a person whose profile can be built up by what they know about you. Based on what you have said, I am unable to build that profile; I asked if you were on drugs. It was just hogwash. "
Sunday, October 19, 2008
DEAR ANN COULTER AND DEAR LAURA INGRAHAM: YES WE ARE COMING AND YES WE HAVE A LIST ALREADY
10/19/2008 10:51:23 PM
After talking to Ann and her very loving conversation, she asked for some slack because she was a very good girl but took some risks and got a little beaten up. She has some slack for being good but a little gung ho. She is a loving girl and almost like a little girl sometimes but it is like warfare and she is unable to take risks due to her physique. Seeking an apology is insane from terrorists and stalkers. When you can loose everything it shows who you are, she asked for some slack to get even. I will take down the posts on being mad at her in a few days. Ann is not interested and did not commit infidelity or blatant error. She was forced to take risks and became so angered and took it personal, she wants to take unnecessary risk even if she can be a push over. Her own friends took advantage of her and made her their prisoner. The typical white guy or black guy reaction.
To Laura Ingraham, we are coming and they are coming and we will rescue you and get you out of this. I promise you, we are coming to get you out of it. We do not guarantee their safety either. Is it the white and black guy? There is more fight in the girls than both of them put together. The best of the best are not their subordinates, they are ours.
Here is a list of only the conservatives but everybody will get the idea:
• Is Ann Coulter to blame? No.
• Is Laura Ingraham to blame? No.
• Is Neil Cavuto doing this? No.
• Is Kudlow guilty? No.
• Is John Gibson doing this? No.
• Is Ted Nugent to blame? No.
• Is Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Caldera, Maher, Hannity, Malkin, McCain, Bush, Powell, Rice, and a lot other? Yes they are guilty and lying.
Had they put Hillary on there, they would have blamed John McCain for having no fight in him while being called a Maverick. He has to rip their head off so we do not get blamed. The only person who has a fight right now is Sara Palin. We are not getting blamed for this and McCain should have ripped their heads off to avoid any and all blame, a fatal mistake.
After talking to Ann and her very loving conversation, she asked for some slack because she was a very good girl but took some risks and got a little beaten up. She has some slack for being good but a little gung ho. She is a loving girl and almost like a little girl sometimes but it is like warfare and she is unable to take risks due to her physique. Seeking an apology is insane from terrorists and stalkers. When you can loose everything it shows who you are, she asked for some slack to get even. I will take down the posts on being mad at her in a few days. Ann is not interested and did not commit infidelity or blatant error. She was forced to take risks and became so angered and took it personal, she wants to take unnecessary risk even if she can be a push over. Her own friends took advantage of her and made her their prisoner. The typical white guy or black guy reaction.
To Laura Ingraham, we are coming and they are coming and we will rescue you and get you out of this. I promise you, we are coming to get you out of it. We do not guarantee their safety either. Is it the white and black guy? There is more fight in the girls than both of them put together. The best of the best are not their subordinates, they are ours.
Here is a list of only the conservatives but everybody will get the idea:
• Is Ann Coulter to blame? No.
• Is Laura Ingraham to blame? No.
• Is Neil Cavuto doing this? No.
• Is Kudlow guilty? No.
• Is John Gibson doing this? No.
• Is Ted Nugent to blame? No.
• Is Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Caldera, Maher, Hannity, Malkin, McCain, Bush, Powell, Rice, and a lot other? Yes they are guilty and lying.
Had they put Hillary on there, they would have blamed John McCain for having no fight in him while being called a Maverick. He has to rip their head off so we do not get blamed. The only person who has a fight right now is Sara Palin. We are not getting blamed for this and McCain should have ripped their heads off to avoid any and all blame, a fatal mistake.
Sunday, May 25, 2008
WHO IS AL QU''IDA AND WHAT DO THEY WANT?
The field of spy catching is a crazy one. The world of conservatism is a crazy one. The field of counter intelligence and counter terrorism is a crazy one. At the heart of the engine is catching a politician and political movements and although this sounds easy, it is very difficult to figure out where and when to draw the line. This invisible force acting on the capitalist market and ripping the fabric of peace apart to enrage human beings is difficult to figure out and understand. Where do you stop and when do you stop, is it victory? When you are able to understand the immense proportion and the efforts of security forces around the world, then you can understand how difficult the task is and who is where. There is a natural inclination and a natural rise to this field and also a natural drift to the bottom.
In order to understand the core or the engine of the Cold War, you must understand history and developments. It is tutelage of an unimaginable proportion and begins with the beginning of man and reaches a natural rise and drift in the modern world. The best way to prevent a drift is to anchor something to the drift to either slow it or stop it and this is where counter culture and counter intelligence is relevant. The field of spy catching and catching terrorist has ended many lives and has led to many deaths; do not underestimate it or the opponents. They are out for victory and to seize the power over the global world, to dominate the world for various reasons and selfish interests. You must know or learn when to draw the line and when to fall back because if someone sets out to catch a bad politician, then there is no shortage whatsoever. The question is if there are any good ones. If you cannot catch them, then do not, make them come to you.
The global world and Cold War politics had a major shakedown during the 1950s and 1960s. Without a doubt this is the earliest period of building a coalition force which is the modern day backbone to global security.
Philosophy aside, radical left wing and liberal political groups place the entire world under siege during the 1960s and implemented a vast barrage of legal standards which either accelerated or caused a free fall to rock bottom. People do not understand what liberalism is or is not. Moreover, they do not understand what conservatives is not about or preserving. Liberalism is a religion. Liberalism is economic policy and economics. Liberalism is war and peace. Liberalism is as close to communism as anyone will come without actually saying the C word or the S word. Some feel that security and militaries are preventing this world of liberalism from taking shape and denying its power under either capitalism or communism. Again, you must know when to stop with this. Is the world liberal and is the fate of the world liberal or only the politicians who need to win elections?
The 1960s integrated the world of liberalism and radical liberal freedom political groups into the everyday life of everyone. Liberalism is fought over and debated as religious intolerance, racial intolerance, gender discrimination, and factors which make up a genetic characteristic or identification of human subjects. Genetics and characteristics have a large determination on life success or acceptance in life and liberalism is the vehicle which fights these inequities and social injustices. At heart is economics and economic fairness. In the 1960s liberalism became the anchor of economics thus this drift to rock bottom. Liberalism is not as readily identifiable as communism or socialism. This is because it crosses into widespread religions, large ethnic groups, sexism, racism, and a sense of hate for the majority of terrorists and former communists. There are liberals who convince themselves they are conservatives but not the opposite role reversal or the correct path. People sense and respond to hate and politeness. Liberals use this kindness and hate to make it impossible to win at Democracy. There is no way to win unless you fit the mold of a liberal and this is why it borders on insanity. Now security people and the military is going around and fighting every human being on earth and trying to stop “bad people” from becoming powerful or prison guards. This is literally impossible yet also why the liberals and opponents to the Cold War feel they can taunt, chide, penetrate, usurp, and seize the political process. They are so powerful and audacious; they know they are not going to be on the run or ever caught.
Pride and embarrassment has caused liberals to become very active. They have to keep the dream alive and the drift anchored to the favor of liberals. In the 1960s you were considered a trouble maker and in modern times you are considered mainstream and even a hero of the people. How do you keep this dream alive when it turns sour because it is anchored and drifting? If it is drifting, can you define the transformation or process conquest or peace? Is this some diabolical conquest or insurgency or a sudden combustion of freedom? Is it a crime, an act of terrorism, and insubordination to elites as liberals make it or something else? Communism is conquest. Socialism is conquest. Liberalism is conquest. There are two forces on earth who understand conquest and force, Nazism and communism, two of the most powerful ideas who merge and unify into one drift anchored to one idea, liberalism. It is a more powerful drug and the most powerful one out there and it feels like you are fighting the world and righteous, a moral religious conviction to seek freedom, fight the devil, widespread spy catching, and escaping a bad master or severe abuse. Two people in the same moment of time, occupying the same space, but with two completely different and opposite thoughts and goals; that is liberalism and conservatism. Conservatism is also economic policy and military strategy for victory.
If you anchor to conservatives, you are supposed to drift a specific course. If you are anchored to liberals, then you also have a specific trajectory. It is easy to figure out who is doing what and who is knocking on the door. They may keep a lot of secrets to invade your home but we can figure out what they are up to and what they are trying to do. Liberals are trying to integrate and merge into a larger world called the global economic world and global power. The way to this global power is to have a single or dual thought in a single moment in time, while occupying the same space, but with two completely different and opposite objectives and goals. It may be subtle liberalism or massaging nuances which are connected to conservatives. It may be cloning and making the exact same product to package and resell to believers or followers in order to keep up or follow along peacefully. There is hatred and discrimination between liberals and conservatives, along with a war to deny and anchor this drift. Do liberals anchor to conservatives or do conservatives anchor to liberals to create this drift? It comes down to a weak on crime mentality. How far do you take this weak on crime mentality or how far do you investigate a crazy atmosphere where every politician is a spy or have some inclination for liberalism? Unless they have some form of this liberal anchor, they cannot be generous and win elections under these conditions for global peace. Do you let this inanity drift to a weak on crime until it combusts?
Nationalism is not conservatism and patriotism is nowhere the religious conviction which liberals deem irresponsible to save the group. All political groups have a set of beliefs they use to hold the group together and also to keep a culture and religion alive for the next generations. The process of holding the group together is the basis of a martyr, but is it conquest or a perfumed ignorance intended for conquest? Unless someone actually has their hair ruffled, they will not understand this drift, what is causing it, who is behind it, and who is doing what to whom in the name of conquest. Martyrdom is the death of human beings and their rise to a kingdom for their fellow man. Liberalism seek this martyrdom because it is identical to socialism and even communism; a known political suicide.
Is warfare between liberals and conservatives this martyrdom? It depends on the anchor process and the liberation. In the early 1950s, the Republicans recruited the trust of General Dwight D. Eisenhower after 1940s New Deal policies anchored the nation to liberal economics. Is warfare between liberals and conservatives this martyrdom? It depends on the anchor process and the liberation. In the early 1950s, the Republicans recruited the trust of General Dwight D. Eisenhower to run against his superior Harry S. Truman of the Democratic Party. The situation became combustible and what used to be a close relationship soon turned out to be no speaking terms between the Democrats and Republicans. "Ike" did not play the political game like politicians and he had the trust of the world. To Ike being generous would hurt the Cold War, not create tensions and fondle conflicts. Ike was considered a liberator and he relied on his Generals to defeat the goliath of McCarthyism which tried to peg at this undercurrent of separation and problem with unification and conquest. Liberals felt Ike did not stand for peace and waged war against
Truman v. Eisenhower was a global plot of liberals to force the hand of the conservatives and make them look or appear as conquests. They could not advance until or unless they were properly integrated in conservatism and elite circles where influence peddling was how to build the machinery. Unless or until the machinery is built, the conservative defection cannot begin or forced to capitulate. It sounds crazy and it is even crazier in practice but this is how you fight the world. Exactly how powerful are the liberals and how much force can they put forth to create a defection? If liberalism is a stronger drug in this world, why would Cold Warriors adopt it knowing it was a hatched plot in the 1960s which took a dive in the 1990s under the next Ike like administration of Ronald Reagan? Everybody knew this was a hatched plot to infiltrate and anchor the global economies of the world to conquest and it riddled spy catchers with soreness. In the 1950s and in response to the New Deal, Dwight D. Eisenhower said, "...And it won't take years of Congressional investigation and a lot of tax money to clean out the whole mess" to address this fuming and overflowing meltdown of liberalism which were the stranglehold of his predecessors. There was so much tension created by liberals it was combustible and a failure. If holding the union together was liberalism then conservatism was on the right path not anchored at all. Truman v. Eisenhower led to US Army crack troops being used and a state of martial law.
The Al Qu’’Ida files are massive and any terrorist expert will have difficulty understand the ravishing and outbreak of terrorism. Global terrorism is currently an accessory of life and a way of expressing convictions, necessity, family values, and a host of other very dangerous and worsening of matters. It is not random violence but preachers, bibles, martyrs, thugs, and guns. The Al Qu’’Ida files have pushed the world over the top of anger and vengeance, a severe combustion. Terrorism is somehow linked to this liberation and this combustion which is closely linked to liberalism. Perhaps it is also an anchor to conquest or martyrdom. Whatever it was, the liberals “took over” where Reagan left off and it took off like a rocket ship; then it starting heading for the ground twice the speed. They are trying to show off and show “US” what they can do and provide as a blanket protection for everyone. Reagan had a second wave and the liberals wanted it and to destroy it. They also wanted to expand their circle of friends to the global level for a blockade and boycott. Globalization was a power they did not know how to cope with peacefully. There was a fight backstage between those who wanted more time or between those about to get on stage and this dragged out for years while the demand for the material was ignored. Meanwhile the middle state of minds were preparing for a stand off and unannounced conquest which nobody would say no to; it was now us and them but nobody knew it.
It is imperative to understand how everybody had been deeply engaged and being attacked by liberals. Conservatives were moving to avoid liberals while letting their ship sink. Liberals felt there was a global conspiracy to undermine socialism and communism. They wanted and needed to strike and exposure to the liberal machine caused everyone to be disgruntled. Therefore, Al Qu’’Ida were initially looked upon as heroes of the people. They were the answer striking out at symbolic authoritarian regimes that went against the liberal machinery and had human rights abuses against liberals. They targeted what produced the taxes, what encouraged the military to fight for, and economic sanctity. They were trying to achieve combustion by the conservatives and a reaction. What it did was created this atmosphere which everybody “deserved it” because everybody was upset with the liberals and blaming them. Terrorism is a reactionary creature to conservatism and leaders who appear in line with the liberal revolution. If you want to look conservative then you had to shave off the beard and not work against the revolution of the 1960s. You had to say yes or how can you not say yes. A lot of people were happy and knew the suspects had hit “US” hard and with everything they had. Something was definitely going on and they were now saying come and get us if you can which turned out to be a tremendous boost for liberalism itself; a double blow to conservatism and Reagan eagerness.
Terrorism is difficult to understand because nobody can figure out the political connections. Moreover, the people who are fighting it are liberals or political groups who are deeply anchored to liberalism. Terrorism is not conservatism but how close or how much is it this plot hatched in the 1960s by liberals? Terrorism has eviscerated every conservative anchor known and disconnected the anchors which conservatism is free drifting and secured it down to liberals who are police groups and political groups deeply anchored to terrorism. Therefore political connections are very important and require the spy catcher to close their eyes and listen to the voice in the back of their minds which speak to them with a third eye wide open. They feel a mole and spy network had infiltrated their security. They feel they were and are being assassinated and need more security and funds. The Cold War is one thing but how do you sell this? You sell it by sitting back observing it and taking notes, let the opponents do the work of the world. These radical groups refuse to turn over information or details to the authorities because this will “steal” their work. It has taken a lot of work and a lot of money to bring it this far along and stealing it is like destroying the left wing or radical liberal economics. It is an act of assassination and a secret war against people who cannot compete and maneuvering into position for a show down, a quiet riot of lunacy.
· Socialism and suicide are one in the same. It is a symbolic fate which is inevitable and an ultimate combustion and violent unrest. To deny it is to be transformed into subhuman insect like stage, a cockroach like state of existence. Suicide bombers are an underground left wing movement like International terrorism.
· Killing a fascist pig is termed “shaheed” or the glory of martyrs. Shaheed is the process of passing shame onto the accused, an act of God; it is a symbolic definition.
· Al Qu’’Ida issued a fatwa in February of 1998 which led to
· The voice of terrorism has ethics and ethnic bias. Maybe this is a curse for liberals but in the world of liberation theory, it is a barrage of perfumed ignorance and favor goes to the liberals.
· there are stories which are twisted and made to fit arguments and plots to cover up failures in thought and discreet imbeciles of agents in charge or their subordinates and favor goes to the liberals
· People are livid with the police or counter terrorism forces including elite military units who risk identification and surveillance to clone or study when they work so closely with infiltrations by liberals and held hostage to integrate their superiority. Now the police and authority is a double edge sword boarding and bonding on the insanity of liberals or conservatives.
· Internal conspiracy plots are widespread and a condition of worsening or absolute paranoia, that is true terror and fear. All liberals are on the move and plotting for victory. They see it the same way and through the same moment in time while occupying the same space.
· Terrorism invigorates liberalism
· this integration process into the on police and security forces by liberals has created an atmosphere of lies and a prerequisite to embrace unions, agents of change, and a dysfunctional government employment which can't seem to get things right or perfect
· If you are not with the revolution and the people, then you need therapy and medication; who is going around and introducing this as official policy?
· Democracy and terrorism is one in the same unless it is liberals in charge
· Liberal objective espionage and economic policy advancement, a closet denial of the inevitable liberation theory of being the same, hence defection
· Liberals are consumed with a perfumed arrogance to say “go away and leave me alone” while they employ psychotic ignorance to pursue or chase others for “freedom.” Freedom to liberals is a police state and warped reality of total flaws superior.
· All peace movements or terrorist groups have a militant wing that enforces the rules and goals of the group; when they are integrated in the state, and then it is legitimized and militarized. This is liberalism and peace.
· It is very difficult to shut the door or release the anchor when they knock on the door and are behind all the doors. Conservatism motto was “just say no”; liberalism motto was “how can you say no.”
After years of investigation and interviewing group members or analysis by terrorism experts, the data is immense and with solid credentials to piece together all the W’s. The only thing missing is the H and how since this rash of terrorism was an outbreak in the White House from 1988 to present day and aimed directly at the military and conservatives. Most specifically, it was the result, a reactionary liberalism, to the events of the Reagan era and bipartisan liberals. The information is immense and logical fluidity. There was a back up and a second wave to Regains Reagan era which the liberals were after; it was a general feeling of being disgruntled and quiet while a witch hunt was taking place. Nobody could say no because it was intended for them to say yes and only yes; had they known or if they were made aware, they would say no. The liberals were headed south and the nation was anchored to them; therefore, they needed more people and more followers; most of all they needed overwhelming force to say no.
- How do enemies become heroes in the eyes of the mistaken?
- Who is fighting the wrong war and on the wrong sides?
- Not random US targets but “symbols” of nations
- Is this large struggle and conflict understood whatsoever or is it being researched by liberals, thus capturing and studying conservatives and the military?
- Bad blood in Africa and racial tensions
- Bad blood with CIA and human rights issues
- Terrorism is liberal reaction to human rights and believability by fire
- Taunt and frustrate policy of superiority
- The ability to live out this religious fate, the inevitable conflict, this true jihad of liberation
- Radicalization, realization, and racial revitalization
- liberalism is a brotherhood as with all other religious convictions fighting the devil or racism
- Pull out, go home, end war, end human rights abuses, support Democracy
- Relations with oil countries are very strained and tensions leading to combustion; profits are on the backs of the common people of the world, a need to nucleoside or nuclear tide, nuclear drift goes to the secular Arab states over oil
- Left wing radicalism in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa supported and trained by left wing radicals in Europe and the Americas.
- Injustices, oppression, inequities, and military action against orthodoxy, profits, selfish intentions, and pure liberalism theory
- Bin Laden opposes all systems of rule and follows none himself
- Foe of the people or for the people liberal radicalism of the 1960s peace movements
- Kenya is a safe haven
- Entire east Africa region is political dominated cell of massive unrest and civil war over economics and political aid
- Symbols of oppression and injustices to the liberal movement and left wing
- Suspicious and weak on crime responses
- Arab counter culture like what swept revolutions in the 1960s
- One enemy theory and cell, a growing morphs of unrest and combustion
- Self defense, land rights, stay away, our homes, our children, our future
- Conservative revolution of Ronald Reagan upset natural order
- Student movement and need for engineers and high technology brain drain to other liberal countries where elitism conditions this revolution; militant Asian nations.
- Extremism and brotherhood is a way out of economic woes, the higher struggle is the overthrow of the state and militant groups
- Safe havens and existing cells all over Europe and mostly North America and Africa
- Legal protections for liberals, immigration, and integration
- Military and foreign aid stimulus to liberal and radicals
- USA playing on two sides of the Arab world
- Arab nuisance, not sure who is behind all the unrest but they have made up their minds for a martyrdom or inevitable fate
- Religion and thugs, the Godless state in denial
- Not afraid to say or do what makes others happy or seeking, an anger to express truism and realism; thus, want others to know how or what they feel
- A way to let others know how fed up they are or how their pride is hurt on both sides of the liberal and conservative military
- Win or loose by integration and revolution a liberal anchor
- Patriotism and nationalism above the underground of bloody and deadly global events
- Ruffling the hair of those comfortable and happy
- The best soldiers in the world and the poor
- Espionage opportunity
- Coalition is a conservative chain of economic giants
- Widespread anti conservatism moderated by Presidents and global political groups
- Radical franchise globally known
- Bragging rights for radical groups (Gladiator coliseums in Chicago, IL)
- Weak on crime governments
- “Political ploy” and “significance” – Charles Powell, terrorism expert –
- “mutating web” and “do not understand” – Jean Louis Bruguiere, terrorism expert –
- “1980s groups such as Red Army, Abu Nodall, IRA, and others” who “disagree” to “amorphous like” – Xavier Raufer, terrorism expert –
- Bosnia and European links in the Balkans
- Islam and free trade or coalition of members from Regional free trade unions (i.e.: European Union)
- Role of Israel and left wing political groups in this free trade wave sweeping the world and brain drain of engineers and computer experts
- US origin of radicalism and planning, face off with leadership and global planners
- The grandest merger ever in the history of mankind
- Arab world thinks Zionism entire media
- Arab world thinks Zionism is capitulation to capitalism
- Everybody loves and supports Israel and killing Arabs for pride
- CIA blames media and false information fed by liberal supporters even if nobody is listening
- Sunday Bloody Sunday, a roof over everybody’s head and reefer in their cupboards
- Concerned how people are judged and by whom; what are these consequences?
- Assimilation problems.
- Rogues launched a secret war, massive injection of support, experience, and funds
- Politicians launched a political war
- Military caught in the Middle of integration, could not peg dollar for global security any longer; had to implement firing orders and management containment contingency
- Police forces got massive boost for liberals to hold the line
- Negotiators put meat hooks in and made torture unbearable; either secret war or political one
- Militant wings created unrest everywhere, a liberal reactionary response
- Liberals all over the world are upset how the revolution is going and why; they wanted to strike at the symbols while they rose to power and instilled policy change and political relief. This was a three to four prong attack in various areas of the world.
- More anesthesia and no more pain; Create pain for opponents while denying any anesthesia or chance; then seek surrender or prison as captive; seek defect or destruction while reinvigorating funds and relief.
- It is difficult to define this cell or compound and how large the force waiting is. Be generous and it won’t hurt as much. Issuing a warrant for the arrest of these radical leaders has been problematic and very difficult. They control the legal and in certain areas, the judge, jury, and executioners. It is impossible to fire them or even catch them. These are untouchable spies and their intention is defection and more support.
- Subtle applause
- Immigration: yes or no? Wreck house and property of others as in the early 1990s while storm was gathering. Renters wrecked up house and property even worse.
- Moving out and overseas made things worse. Now more attacks and more damages again in early 1900s as the storm were gathering. Liberals were complaining to the boss and making the boss complain to the liberals; thus this back and forth avoidance period with the liberals. They were casing the city and the targets to hit or the leaders by infiltrating the conservatives.
- Police pressures were immense payments were needed or risk of possible arrest and imprisonment. Police forces also kept the pressure up by declaring mentally ill or insane, were they talking to the boss back in the early 1990s before sudden combustion.
- These groups were floating around Washington D.C. asking who wanted in since after the Reagan era in 1988. They were linked to Chicago, New York, South Africa, and Britain initially. There was no sign of Middle East activity or any clues of a Middle East plot only an anti right or anti conservative wave of reactionary by the great communicator of events to come.
- Terrorism is a process of reclamation or retribution for the political events of the 1960 to 2008 and it all came out of Texas and the mid west states. This reclamation was seeking admission and disavowing the events of the 1960s by conservatives while pushing the liberal revolution one step over the top. Once over the top, defection and scornful liberation can occur regarding a host of embarrassments.
- This period of reclamation had the Reagan Generals on the run and with federal charges and indictments until information was presented which vindicated them. Some were targeted for assassination by the liberals and the militant wing; others were targeted for kidnapping and re-education; and others were put under surveillance to find the headquarters and the gold. The liberals also had the British intelligence on the run and panicked with events in Europe. That information was being guarded closely by the liberals and deadly. The implications were so severe they were willing to kill in cold blood to protect it or shut people up. They want people to say yes and not question them or bipartisanship.
- Felt the pegging of the greenback was under danger by oil money, inflation, and various threats. When the Europeans began to peg on a single currency, this was a sure sign of panic because the oil states held the decisions along with the global free traders. Panic struck the liberal compound and their economists. The ground began to shake economically and led to rash irresponsible economic failures. Pressure was building up from everywhere while nationalism was the reactionary.
- Use of the word “terrorist” and “Nazi” is used loosely and scornfully. When high rewards and cash bounties were offered for terrorists, it led to many abuses and definitions. Politicians and group leaders were ignored; only the militant wing was targeted which led experts to become confused by a morphing process of events and a worsening of the problem. Combustion and a quiet riot were coming and the cells were already in place.
- Iraq could be a pro Israel or anti Israel surge and a witch hunt was underway. The liberals feel they are the voice in the Middle East and the only voice because of anti secular Democratic regimes and religious conviction. Oil was funneling globalization and a primary enabler. If the oil flowed freely then the brotherhood would be in grave danger because of the pegging process and the currency problems.
- Iraq was a test for the best Generals and not the worst to present a solution and to seek rewards or rank. It will work in the favor of the liberals while taking down the conservatives or reverse Reagan trickle down theory. The best solution was to pay a stipend to militant groups and have them agree to armistice in return for payments.
- A veteran for peace is a transformation from warriors to peace activist and re-education.
- Bosnia is the centrifuge of East and West intermixing, liberal and conservative religions; it is a hub of this revolution but no longer under communist control. The people who had created the atmosphere did not leave and the liberalism was in full swing. This is not communism, this is the age of liberalism and the cells are everywhere in the world. The financing machine is everywhere and more difficult to trace due to the liquidity.
- Something triggered the combustion, perhaps a figurative event which caused severe hurt or some frustration of not being able to progress. A severe despair set in. Maybe the grip and bad policies of the Clinton and Bush years led to severe despair and frustration. This was now very crazy stuff and trying new things, a surge. Perhaps it is a testament between religious conviction, liberalism, and thug politics in the age of technology. People blamed the government and they lived under the rule of liberals who wanted to strike out.
- Exactly how powerful is the liberal movement compared to the conservative movement in the world? This was some type of measure and a new age.
- Conservatives would never sit down with the enemy but the danger is the enemy seeking them. The enemy wants peace and revolution and when frustrated, strikes out with combustion and liberalism. Conservatives become hard liners under this pressure, not militant revolutionaries.
- It is uncertain who is holding the union hostage when economics usually hold the union together and Constitutionalism. At this time debt is holding the union or keeping it from socialism.
- Liberals, both males and females, believed in themselves and a sense of truth and honor to be free and free of any authority to govern their life which was the birth of liberation theory during the 1960s and Civil Rights laws. Civil Rights laws repelled issues such as sexism, racism, and widespread discrimination or hate. It did not address bias or motives, only legal and literal interpretations. The issue was ripping society in pieces.
- Canada has always been a safe haven for radicals, liberals, and draft dodging peace activists. The Canadian underground is closely linked to Al Qu’’Ida. It is like a return to the Austin Powers’s movie and psychedelic times but out of touch with the times. The leaders of the counter culture have expanded and they are very mad and very intent on overthrowing the state if they can get everyone to agree to yes or not have a choice in the matter. They are extremely hurt and their pride has nowhere left to go but to drift while anchored.
The origin of radical extremism and religion can be traced back to events in both Africa and the United States of America. In 1964, the Organization of African Unity was formed in conjunction to many Islamic brotherhood groups assimilating in the United States and other places. The African plight was the same plight of many African Americans in the United States. In the United States, the preferred method of the Islamic brotherhood was bombings. Malcolm X himself after being firebombed and eventually killed said, “This is how they fight.” In the movie, “Lethal Weapon” fire and house bombings also indicated an African plot to radical South African terrorists roaming the United States. Therefore, these things are known.
In the case of certain groups such as The Nation of Islam, their grievances were internal and directed at each other. The police had infiltrated the group and they did not trust each other. They did not know if the problem was the police or their own members. This same mindset is fixated on liberal and conservatives in politics. The general result is a deep feeling of being disgruntled and stepped on. Since Vietnam, there has been a rash of secret wars in South America and even Africa. Only until the Persian Gulf War came up on the radar screen did the world see something new and different. On September 11, 1990 President George H.W. Bush issued a fatwa on naked aggression and new surge of “Nazism.” It was a pure form of aggression and brute force which was unstoppable politically or militarily.
Military might and allied coalition forces were tearing this world apart. At the same, it was keeping it together and peaceful. The only time Indonesia has ever surfaced on the radar was during the early 1960s and the period of Sukharto who had bad blood with the CIA because of the socialist and communist leanings. Naturally, the tensions between the East and West were symbolized by the East Timor conflict where human rights became once again some form of genocide on the Jewish Portuguese colony. The same mindset can apply to the Philippines and the years of struggle there. Pre World War II and post World War II in the Philippines were very liberal oriented and it stifled economic progress; then led the nation into bouts with extreme poverty. Tensions between the Philippines and Japan led to bad relationships in the Navy and other military structures.
THE 1960'S AND THE REAGAN REVOLUTION: THE STORM
Most people who have grown up in the
This transformation is as follows. Liberation movements seeking social equality and the overthrow of the government for a larger global struggle were legitimized legally and public awareness and acceptance of them decreased. In the eyes of the public, they had grown up and were no longer a threat but had legitimized their plight as political opponents or took their cause to a more legitimate level. At the same time, the economic conditions made them primary suspects and individuals who had the greatest motives to legitimize legally this transformation and accusation of some widespread conspiracy by the government to destroy the lives of innocent people.
These liberal and left wing groups have always been the center of much criticism and suspicions. Historically, the members of these groups and their traditional politics were of grave suspicion to a greater war and a greater struggle between nations. Some call them opponents of the right wing movement and the military. In each and every case, these left wing and liberal radicals have been tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. During the 1960s, this heightened period of social tension established a period of both change and legitimization of this problem.
This torment and rivalry has not gone away. Over the course of fifty odd years from the 1940s most if not all of the efforts of government security has been directed towards these individuals and elaborate international espionage rings. There was a big insurgency and an attempt to seize the instruments of government and legitimize and forward this larger and greater war. The 1960s were a tragic joke which reaffirmed this inking and crawling movement which was there and in existence. There was a higher and much more professional side of this greater struggle. The history of this struggle is racked with one case after another which points to liberal and left wing groups, politics, beliefs, religion, and economic plight. This was a sophisticated struggle over control of the nation and the world. In other countries, it was tied to government overthrow and regime power changes. This was left wing against the right wing and solid economic policies to power.
After the 1960s, these groups became incorporated into society and legitimized as a legal political opponent. Police actions against them and surveillance took a backseat to immediate threats and violence. Thus, instead of being under surveillance or classified as an enemy of the state, these groups were being targeted and victims of hate crimes or acts of terrorism. The legal proposition has always been in the favor of these groups seeking political rights and legitimacy. Their left wing beliefs and the threat of overthrowing the government for a wider and greater struggle dwarfed the idea they were victims and targets for terrorism. Therefore, part of their complaint was the inability to acquire police action and protections, a denial and confirmation of a legal nuisance and denial of rights.
Beginning in the 1980s, another problem afflicted the development of these radical left wing movements. They disappeared and became incorporated in the larger political system now that their struggle was legitimized and even successfully won in the courts. They had the support of the general public; however, this is a period of downfall and tremendous economic pressure. This political base was eviscerated and annulated like a military bomb was dropped on them. The growing suspicion was a conspiracy by traditional political enemies to destroy them and assonate their political struggle. It was viewed as poison before and now it was viewed as self inflicted poison, a time period of drinking “kook-aid” and political suicide. They felt a quiet conspiracy and a covert effort to eradicate them was taking place and it felt as if this was the case because they had no reality to stand on any longer but had been legitimized. The public accepted these 1960s radicals and assimilated them into the nation. They were no longer on target lists and were not supposed to be victims any longer.
During this period, terrorism kicked up tremendously. These radical left wing and liberal groups were new recruits now and fighting radical religious extremism. The public accepted them now as the police, an anti terrorist squad, and no longer a traditional threat. It seemed as though the process of political protection was expanded to a global and even military level. Now the traditional enemies were on counter insurgency teams. They were leading investigations into attacks on the nation. There were plots to kill or maim them and violence which was typical in the 1960s by hate groups. The traditional espionage enemies who were under surveillance for tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system; were now investigating it. They had their political enemies and opponents under police actions. They were legalized and legitimized and now were conducting interrogations and police investigations.
However, they were struggling in the most difficult and most threatening period of their life. Their “father of the struggle” and ideological basis of their belief system collapsed. They were eviscerated and evicted from the political scene internationally and no longer a global solidarity or solvent nation. If their spy ring or invisible grand elaborate espionage plot which was too powerful globally, then it too was eviscerated, torched, and disembowel. They were no longer tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system and driven to the point of either surrender or war. This was a global blow of a magnitude unimagined because trillions of dollars had been spent to destroy them by governments. If they were chasing and trying to destroy and tormenting right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system; then this Cold War finally ended.
This was not the case and not what was going on. The entire left wing was on a witch hunt and trying to interrogate people to find out how the socialist movement was defeated or who if anyone conspired to end communism. The liberal movement was destroyed by conservatives. In this effort to trick and entice people, they wanted or tried to induce as much pain and suffering as possible. It is an effort to intierror-gate Cold Warriors and military personnel to forfeit how the communist bloc was destroyed and the traditional hard line position. That is similar to saying “right wing conspiracy.” Under the cloak of some state security service and bipartisan investigation, they were launching a witch hunt to uncover this conspiracy to embarrass and humiliate the left wing and liberals. Then turn around and punish as harshly as possible anyone who showed up on the radar or until someone provided answers. This liberal movement now was discredited and under tremendous pressure politically and in the public eye; however, they were under so much pressure they were made to appear either real or imagined lunatics and crazy people who sought democratic rights. They were made to look, feel, act, and conditioned to be a joke and pathological liars.
In 1967, roles would be considered a protestor and a peace activist. Today, you would be classified as a liberal left wing hero fighting terrorism and Arab nationalism. In 1967, roles would be considered anti communist or Cold Warriors. Today, you would be classified as a conservative felon and primary suspects or terrorists against the peace movement and socialism. Driven to the point of despair and self destruction, it was now impossible to do this peacefully and overthrow the government peacefully. The plight for nonviolence had to be abandoned because it was getting nowhere and politically was a lunatic cause, an act of political suicide which was the fate of socialist cult groups during the 1960s. These groups were forced into a position of inadequacy and they wanted blood; they wanted to throw everything at and increase the tormenting of right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. It was not surrender but almost a shooting war. The left wing feels they were politically assented and a new killing season to deny a merger of minds to the right wing and a call to surrender by the right wing that they were tormenting. They felt the government was now union busting and the political will was a union bust which is going to hurt a bipartisan effort. They think it is a union bust and liberal bust which is also what brought down the Soviets and communism. Who did it?
The people who were fighting for hippies and liberation or peace, today are fighting for liberal rights. There is some form of liberation theory and some liberal revolution. Conservatives are just not conservative enough for this new revolution. It’s all debt and controlling inflation, a closed shop. There is nothing that makes sense. Conservatives are now counter culture. Liberals are trying to change the nation and have a new religion or new liberal theory. If you look at the most wanted list, the FBI in 1967 was after all leftists. Today, most if not all are right wing while liberals are not considered. This is why most conservatives are siding with the left wing; it does not pay to be conservatives. There was a counter reaction movement internal to government. An internal and illegal Civil War which had been fighting since the early 1900s and much greater than all the armies in the world; there was no army in the world which could or had a chance against this threat.
There is a hostile revolutionary group who is working with elected officials to figure out why they cannot pay the bills and having so many financial problems. They claim it is a conspiracy to get rid of them and make them worse people who are stronger at the ballot box. If they are cold warriors and real interrogators, they would brandish something; not show a soviet style spy network and families who are trying to recruit others for this ring of thieves and socialists. It is not a conspiracy it is bipartisan and secret investigations; left wing undercover work and sleuthing. They know the union bust and the crackdown if they are not careful; especially hitting and facing off the military with everything they have. They feel the military is behind it all and originated with the Reagan administration and kept up the pressure afterwards. Once again, a merger was occurring and two sides were going. What about the militant wing and their efforts to tormenting of right wing politics, economic policy, and the military system. It was not surrender but almost a shooting war. They are still victims and wanted to merge again with the traditional enemies of this war. They also wanted another level of political legitimacy but had this conspiracy holding them back. It was a stand off of traditional forces.
They feel the military is behind this and originated with the Reagan administration who kept up the pressure afterwards. It is a left wing secret army bent on figuring out what they can get away with and how strong of a force they will need; it is bipartisan dominated effort to seek revenge and not solidify political beliefs and goals. They do not have the ability to nonviolently protest and want to know how far they can get with this disgruntled revenge merger. The federal agents stared them down so many times and hit them with everything they had. They hit back with the usual politics and legitimizing process of legal standards conducting a victim of terrorism and peaceful protest. The people behind this are the security services and some claim to be cold warriors. The entire left wing is on a witch hunt and trying hard to interrogate people to find out how the socialist movement was defeated or who if anyone conspired to end communism. In this effort to trick and entice people, they want to induce as much pain and suffering as possible. It was a conspiracy at the highest levels and it came to an abrupt end.
It is not that difficult to figure out. Nothing good has ever come from politics and until that changes or this world can dispose of this problem, it will dump its “peace” on others and attack them in the name of “progress.” That is greed and the pure greed of both right and left wings. It is also a total idiot of a loser who is going around, with might and audacity, not asking but yelling at others how they are on the verge of losing their minds. How total losers in this world can get away with yelling at others or being in their lives while telling them they are on the verge of losing their minds is a mystery. It is also pure lunacy.
The political system is consumed by lies and at this time they are on the verge of lunacy and are not thinking clearly. Big large problems sputter by this lack of reality and dealt with by borrowing money and debt. In the end, people will vote for them because they are desperate and dependant; they have no other choice because the capacity of the earth’s population has exceeded its capacity to support itself. The same applies to liberal economic theory and this idea of left wing politics. It makes no sense to keep borrowing and increase debt when the earth’s capacity is well exceeded and well past its capacity to support itself. From here on it will be reverse evolution and constant struggle with lunatics who are on the verge of insanity and lunacy. When they loose all sense of reality, they will attack with force in the name of peace and prosperity. They have to eat and they have to watch out for their interests. Who in their right mind would use sheep to catch monsters, which is not red baiting?
Oil and energy policy has made good bait because politicians love to borrow and spend money they do not have. Instead of doing the right thing, they want to borrow more money for health care and the energy crisis while lowering interest rates to a level with encourages more debt and spending. It is either that or recession. This is a total idiot who is on the verge of insanity and loosing their minds. They are trying hard to avoid questions and telling what diabolic plan or plot they have in their mischievous and evil minds. They were proud to be part of communism before and now they are proud to wreck capitalism or wreck the lives of innocent people. This is a terrorist and someone who wants to vandalize everything not because they love communism or can win, but simply because they are thugs and total losers. This is a terrorist who has convinced themselves they are mighty, strong, and possess or control others. It is clear they are disturbed and secretive and being held back before something bad happens. What they do not tell others will not hurt them or expose them.
As disturbed and deranged as they are, they want others to reconsider holding them back. The people in this world are arming themselves to the teeth because they have the right to live and have a right to be free. However, when you have lunatics and losers who insist they are the same or of equal quality as everyone, then fight tooth and nail everyone who wants to die or fight back, then their effort to be the same needs to come to an end. If this means holding them back, then most people would not know what to do or what to say to this utter loser who is in despair and desperate. Are they for peace and prosperity or are they the closest representation to the devil this world has seen. The world knows and understands the left wing and the liberals are the closest representation to this concept. The question is when and if they attack and overthrow what holds them down. Should everybody reconsider holding them down while they fight everyone who gets in the way of this march to political suicide?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
